Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:43:19 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1180#Comment_1180 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1180#Comment_1180 Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:55:44 -0800 Kevin Lin Can you merge [reference] and [references] into [reference-request]?

]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1172#Comment_1172 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1172#Comment_1172 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:33:38 -0800 Scott Morrison Awesome, let's start tagging as [reference-request] and [online-*] as appropriate. If anyone has suggestions for tags that should be merged into these, speak up!

]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1168#Comment_1168 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1168#Comment_1168 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:53:06 -0800 Kevin Lin How about [reference-request]? I am also all for [online-blah] tags.

]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1166#Comment_1166 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1166#Comment_1166 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:32:39 -0800 Scott Morrison Maybe we should consider [request-for-reference]? I'd also be happy to see some tags along the lines of [online-resources], [online-books].

]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1165#Comment_1165 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/108/references-tag/?Focus=1165#Comment_1165 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:39:44 -0800 Kevin Lin I noticed that there is a "reference" tag and a "books" tag. Should they be combined into a single tag? Also is there any preference as to "references" vs. "reference"?

]]>