tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:52:51 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Harry Gindi comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9765) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9765#Comment_9765 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9765#Comment_9765 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:43:15 -0700 Harry Gindi Meanwhile, welcome back, Harald! Your absence was noted.

]]>
Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9764) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9764#Comment_9764 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9764#Comment_9764 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:16:46 -0700 Harald Hanche-Olsen The acronym MOB should be reserved for the Mathoverflow bar, which should be like meta I suppose but with more tolerance for off topic discussions and colourful language.

]]>
Will Jagy comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9763) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9763#Comment_9763 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9763#Comment_9763 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:00:21 -0700 Will Jagy Cam McLeman comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9762) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9762#Comment_9762 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9762#Comment_9762 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:50:10 -0700 Cam McLeman
I did get a bit of a chuckle at "closed as not a real proposal". ]]>
José Figueroa comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9761) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9761#Comment_9761 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9761#Comment_9761 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:57:31 -0700 José Figueroa Is SE the right architecture for a blog? I thought the whole point of SE was that it was made to discourage discussion: comments and answers get reordered,... Anyway, good luck.

]]>
basic comments on "Proposal of MathOverblog on StackExchange" (9757) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9757#Comment_9757 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/718/proposal-of-mathoverblog-on-stackexchange/?Focus=9757#Comment_9757 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:08:26 -0700 basic
The idea of this MOB site is quite simple. The difference of it from MO is that MO requires genuine questions, while on MOB you can just blog (like any mathematical bloggers do). I personally see the advantage of MOB (as contrast to traditional blogs) being:
1.people can start off easily (you don't have to open a blog by yourself and maintain it regularly)
2.You can vote on interesting entries.

The potential disadvantages:
1.topics can be really off-topic. i.e., it's relatively harder to define what is a good MOB entry. (in contrast, MO nowadays has a very good standard)
2. users might not be as active as on MO.

But in any case, it's free, so I just opened the proposal. Have a try if you like. Thanks. ]]>