The comment does not concern hypothetical reputation which may have been gained on a website of different design where no CW limit is in place.
]]>since we don't care about reputation
I mean, not to sound like a baby, but I care about the ability to use those perks obtained by attaining a particular score. For instance, if I had time to seriously participate on this site again, I would definitely care about reputation up to 10,000, because the ability to read deleted posts and vote for deletion are both pretty useful, especially since deleted questions are basically deleted off the face of the earth from the POV of a <10,000-rep user. When I did participate a lot, I was extremely pleased when I gained the ability to edit other people's posts and also vote to close. The sense in which reputation is meaningless is that it doesn't really reflect the amount of respect you deserve/receive
]]>That said, the ability of 2.0 moderators tI undo auto-CWseems more trouble than it could possibly be worth.
]]>I think that this feature is less-useful here since people care less if their answer is CW or not.
]]>