tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Why does hardly anybody use this board?)

Peter McNamara comments on "Why does hardly anybody use this board?" (22790)

Peter McNamara — Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:07:23 -0800

I just found out that this site existed.

In more detail, I knew that tea.mathoverflow existed but was under the obviously false impression that it was for archival purposes only in the MO 2.0 world. I thought that discussion was only possible on meta.

Asaf Karagila comments on "Why does hardly anybody use this board?" (22789)

Asaf Karagila — Thu, 04 Dec 2014 03:34:19 -0800

When I have something to say I say it. Not often, however, people post something which makes me want to say something.

But I do check this board, on average, I'd say about once a day.

Yemon Choi comments on "Why does hardly anybody use this board?" (22788)

Yemon Choi — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:22:25 -0800

I'd keep reading and participating if this is where things were still discussed.

Joel Reyes Noche comments on "Why does hardly anybody use this board?" (22787)

Joel Reyes Noche — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:00:37 -0800

Yes. I suppose the newcomers don't know about it; or perhaps they know about it but don't like the hassle of creating a new account just to join it.

Another possible reason that tea isn't being used much is because now we have meta as well as chat.

quid comments on "Why does hardly anybody use this board?" (22786)

quid — Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:56:20 -0800

I wonder why the usage of this board essentially stopped if supposedly not few would like to continue using it. Can anybody offer some insight?

Also this is a test to see if or who is following.

Is there anybody out there? :-)