tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Response to the questions)

trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16053)

2011-09-10T08:43:46-07:00

but i am unable to find the option to close,somebody please close it

trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16052)

2011-09-10T08:42:36-07:00

i myself close the thread ,why to make the others heroes unnecessarily,and create a fuss here,i didnt know why the meta was for,i close it ok

Andres Caicedo comments on "Response to the questions" (16051)

2011-09-10T07:31:57-07:00

+1 Alex re closing this thread

quid comments on "Response to the questions" (16050)

2011-09-10T03:31:00-07:00

trustgod (regarding the answer): Meanwhile, Gjergji Zaimi asked you something and you responded. However, for me your anwer in the comment is a bit too short [I am not an expert on this material, but then also confident to claim that my knoweldege on this is not below that of the average reader on math.SE]. Perhaps you could give a detailed and precise argument (on math.SE) for what you claim surely works; because this seems to be the key-point. Without this I am afraid the answer is perhaps not very helpful; I do not claim it is not correct just that I (and I assume I am not alone) cannot understand it in this form. In case you are worried the total length of your answer would then be too long, perhaps rather leave away some of the more general material. Thanks in adavnce!

Alex Bartel comments on "Response to the questions" (16049)

2011-09-10T01:54:59-07:00

Just think what would happen if everybody who posts a question or an answer on MSE created a thread on meta.MO with the sole purpose of alerting people to the MSE post. That would make meta.MO completely unusable, I hope you agree. This thread is off topic and will hopefully be closed soon.

trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16048)

2011-09-10T00:44:40-07:00

@Qiaochu Yuan:i was told not to post at MO,but not at meta,i can discuss something in meta,and moreover sorry for mentioning your name,i edited and removing it,
and by the way ,do you have any objection???,i think not,neither i am posting any harsh comments,neither i am claiming something,nor i am asking some advanced level questions,
and as MO meta is just for asking the suggestions ,i dont think i am prevented from this,

Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Response to the questions" (16047)

2011-09-09T12:48:42-07:00

Why are you posting here if you were told not to come back to MO?

trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16046)

2011-09-09T09:00:10-07:00

As everyone know i have been suspended from MO,and i was advised to post at Math stack exchange,i have posted a good question on Tate-shafarevich Group, http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/63054/intuition-and-stumbling-blocks-in-proving-the-finiteness-of-wc-group
and even though i got an answer ,it doesnt account for the exact Questions,rather it went outside ,but it was a good suggestion and i respect it and follow it ,
so i request the good people present in this community like Pete L.clark,Mark Sapir,David speyerTodd trimble,kevin Buzzard,Franz lemmermeyer,etc... to waste their valuable time and have a look over it ,and answer it,

and also i answered one question ,and i didnt get any comments ,can you please comment whether it was upto the mark or not,my answer was here
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21883/does-fermats-last-theorem-hold-for-cyclotomic-integers-in-mathbbq-zeta-37/62772#62772
thanks a lot ,to all seniors,
i am in debt with you all professors,