tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (markup in comments) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:38:46 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Scott Morrison comments on "markup in comments" (433) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=433#Comment_433 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=433#Comment_433 Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:13:03 -0800 Scott Morrison A complaint about preview not matching the results. I haven't investigated: just dropping this here for reference.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "markup in comments" (403) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=403#Comment_403 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=403#Comment_403 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:41:02 -0800 Scott Morrison Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "markup in comments" (388) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=388#Comment_388 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=388#Comment_388 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:23:56 -0800 Harald Hanche-Olsen Oh, and I just discovered another one: When there are too many comments, so you need to click the “add/show n more comments” button, you don't get jsMath markup for the revealed comments. Reloading the page just hides those comments again of course, so there seems to be no way to use jsMath markup in these comments (example).

]]>
Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "markup in comments" (387) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=387#Comment_387 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=387#Comment_387 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:00:19 -0800 Harald Hanche-Olsen Anton Geraschenko comments on "markup in comments" (46) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=46#Comment_46 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=46#Comment_46 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:06:14 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @rwbarton: I'll add escaping special characters to the Tips and Tricks page.

@Scott: upvoted. As I said, I don't think this feature is likely to be implemented, but there's no harm in trying. One thing that would help is if you edited your feature-request to explicitly describe the desired behavior. Should there be a preview button (like there is here) or should it be a live preview (like the Markdown WMD, but it would have to be new javascript which reflects the limited markup allowed in comments)? Should the preview appear above or below the comment input box (I would say above)? Another thing that would help is if you explain what kinds of problems people are having and link to explicit examples (or produce an example on the feature-request itself). Note that Fog Creek has said that if a feature-request is very general (applies to S[OFU] as well as SE), then they will wait for the SO team to implement it rather than doing it themselves. Though a comment preview feature-request hasn't appeared on meta.SO, comment editing has, and it is [status-planned]. If we feel like being able to edit comments is sufficient, then we should be pushing the SO team rather than the SE team.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "markup in comments" (45) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=45#Comment_45 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=45#Comment_45 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:46:32 -0700 Scott Morrison I didn't find a corresponding feature request over at meta.stackexchange.com, so I made one: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2130/preview-for-comments

If you have an account over there, and 15 rep, go upvote it!

]]>
rwbarton comments on "markup in comments" (43) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=43#Comment_43 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=43#Comment_43 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:04:22 -0700 rwbarton
Oh, this is good to know. But I think most people don't know that, and since there is no preview, they may easily leave an incomprehensible comment. ]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "markup in comments" (40) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=40#Comment_40 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=40#Comment_40 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:02:05 -0700 Anton Geraschenko Preview for questions and answers is really important because editing a question or answer is a big deal. The post can be very long, involving lists, symbols, diagrams, and images. And when you post a question or answer or edit a post, that thread gets bumped to the front of the homepage.

Comments on the other hand are forced to be very simple. The only markup is italics and bold, they are limited to 600 characters, and they don't move the question around or call attention to it in any way. I admit that sometimes when I see how a comment turns out, I don't like something about it, so copy the text, delete the comment, and post it again. This is mildly annoying, but I don't think it warrants adding a preview for comments feature. Unless a feature is really helpful, it feels like feature creep to me.

]]>
Qiaochu Yuan comments on "markup in comments" (38) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=38#Comment_38 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=38#Comment_38 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:41:56 -0700 Qiaochu Yuan Anton Geraschenko comments on "markup in comments" (33) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=33#Comment_33 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=33#Comment_33 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:20:26 -0700 Anton Geraschenko You can escape special markup characters with backslashes. For example, typing a \*test\* will product "a *test*" rather than "a test".

]]>
rwbarton comments on "markup in comments" (28) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=28#Comment_28 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/9/markup-in-comments/?Focus=28#Comment_28 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:30:37 -0700 rwbarton
As far as I can tell no markup is allowed in comments except *...* and _..._ for italics and **...** for bold. In particular things like "<sub>" are preserved. This makes it very difficult to convey things like "H_n(X) -> H_n(Y)" or "H^*(X) -> H^*(Y)". In my opinion it would be greatly preferable to not do any special processing to *...*, _..._, **...** either. If it means people have to read emphasized words surrounded by stars or underscores rather than italicized, that is not a substantial loss. ]]>