tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (ambiguous/overloaded tags) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:47:28 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4649) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4649#Comment_4649 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4649#Comment_4649 Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:23:45 -0700 Anton Geraschenko

Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me?

Because that bumps the questions to the top of the home page.

I'll go with the solution Jonas proposed, but I reserve the right to merge unwanted tags into [tag-removed]. Rather than blocking this tag, you should simply remove it from the question whenever you see it at the top of the home page. If a question is really awful (and hence doesn't have any other tags at all, so you can't remove [tag-removed]), then it won't ever get bumped because everybody will ignore it, so you won't see it anyway. I don't see any reason to have [tag-removed] in your ignored list.

]]>
Jonas Meyer comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4648) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4648#Comment_4648 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4648#Comment_4648 Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:12:22 -0700 Jonas Meyer Harry Gindi comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4647) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4647#Comment_4647 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4647#Comment_4647 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:06:14 -0700 Harry Gindi Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me?

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4646) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4646#Comment_4646 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4646#Comment_4646 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:53:14 -0700 Anton Geraschenko rwbarton comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4645) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4645#Comment_4645 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4645#Comment_4645 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:12:01 -0700 rwbarton Sonia Balagopalan comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4603) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4603#Comment_4603 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4603#Comment_4603 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:48:40 -0700 Sonia Balagopalan But some questions in both the disc-geom and comb-geom tags could do with retagging as the other, and some should be tagged [finite-geometry]. I don't have the rep, so if someone could oblige? ]]> François G. Dorais comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4601) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4601#Comment_4601 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4601#Comment_4601 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:45:21 -0700 François G. Dorais @Steve, metric geometry was actually what I wanted to ask about in this old thread on "What is ...?" questions. I think tag ambiguity is often enough an issue that it needs to be looked into, but I don't have any good ideas how to fix this problem.

@Mark, I found that page helpful from time to time, but it doesn't seem to match common usage. For example, I've seen the tag [mg.metric-geometry] deleted and replaced by [discrete-geometry] when the latter is listed under math.MG. I honestly don't know enough about MG to determine what's right and what's wrong, but this particular tag has been very puzzling to me.

]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4599) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4599#Comment_4599 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4599#Comment_4599 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:36:17 -0700 Harry Gindi I actually posted something in [combinatorial-geometry] about simplicial sets, and they definitely do not fit in discrete or finite geometry, even though they are combinatorial and geometric objects.

]]>
Mark Meckes comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4598) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4598#Comment_4598 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4598#Comment_4598 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:35:19 -0700 Mark Meckes
Not completely informative, but a good start. ]]>
Sonia Balagopalan comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4597) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4597#Comment_4597 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4597#Comment_4597 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:30:16 -0700 Sonia Balagopalan Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3727) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3727#Comment_3727 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3727#Comment_3727 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:51:19 -0800 Steve Huntsman Jonas Meyer comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3718) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3718#Comment_3718 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3718#Comment_3718 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:00:08 -0800 Jonas Meyer Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3717) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3717#Comment_3717 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3717#Comment_3717 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:18:37 -0800 Steve Huntsman Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3686) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3686#Comment_3686 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3686#Comment_3686 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:09:18 -0800 Anton Geraschenko @Steve re [ordinary-differential-equations]: There is a character limit on tags, so it would automatically be shortened to [ordinary-differential-equ].

btw, if you have enough rep to vote on meta.SE, please vote up Scott's request to extend the character limit on tags if you haven't already done so.

]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3675) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3675#Comment_3675 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3675#Comment_3675 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:35:05 -0800 Steve Huntsman rwbarton comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3673) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3673#Comment_3673 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3673#Comment_3673 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:38:58 -0800 rwbarton
There is a thread for such requests here: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/34/2/tag-mergerename-reqests/ ]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3670) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3670#Comment_3670 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3670#Comment_3670 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:05:02 -0800 Steve Huntsman Scott Morrison comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3669) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3669#Comment_3669 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3669#Comment_3669 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:56:09 -0800 Scott Morrison I've just merged [ca.classical-analysis-ode] to [ca.classical-analysis]. Let me know if I should switch it the other way. The proper name is "Classical Analysis and ODEs", and we don't otherwise abbreviate, but as the shorter tag already predominated (well, 17 to 10), I went with that.

I agree that many of the analysis and differential-equations tags should be replaced. Let me know if there are any tag merges that need a moderator, but it seems unfortunately that this requires by-hand attention.

]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3668) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3668#Comment_3668 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3668#Comment_3668 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:36:24 -0800 Steve Huntsman
tl;dr--"analysis" and "differential-equations" are overloaded/overused/ambiguous, many should be replaced with arxiv and/or ODE tags. Also, the two "ca.*" tags should be merged. Thoughts? ]]>