tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Proper name for a partial order)2018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Proper name for a partial order" (15399)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1102/proper-name-for-a-partial-order/?Focus=15399#Comment_153992011-08-06T11:22:48-07:002018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00Harald Hanche-Olsenhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/18/
I don't see why not. There are currently 101 questions with the tag [terminology], and your question should fit right in. Moreover it is a question with a definite answer. I'd say go ahead with it.
I don't see why not. There are currently 101 questions with the tag [terminology], and your question should fit right in. Moreover it is a question with a definite answer. I'd say go ahead with it.
]]>
victorsmiller comments on "Proper name for a partial order" (15390)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1102/proper-name-for-a-partial-order/?Focus=15390#Comment_153902011-08-06T07:04:55-07:002018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00victorsmillerhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/421/
In a recent paper of mine, my co-authors found that a partial order that we were using was contained in a paper by Kundgen. In it, he called it "right-shifted partial order". I ...