tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Proper name for a partial order) 2018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Proper name for a partial order" (15399) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1102/proper-name-for-a-partial-order/?Focus=15399#Comment_15399 2011-08-06T11:22:48-07:00 2018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00 Harald Hanche-Olsen http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/18/ I don't see why not. There are currently 101 questions with the tag [terminology], and your question should fit right in. Moreover it is a question with a definite answer. I'd say go ahead with it. I don't see why not. There are currently 101 questions with the tag [terminology], and your question should fit right in. Moreover it is a question with a definite answer. I'd say go ahead with it.

]]>
victorsmiller comments on "Proper name for a partial order" (15390) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1102/proper-name-for-a-partial-order/?Focus=15390#Comment_15390 2011-08-06T07:04:55-07:00 2018-11-04T23:13:05-08:00 victorsmiller http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/421/ In a recent paper of mine, my co-authors found that a partial order that we were using was contained in a paper by Kundgen. In it, he called it "right-shifted partial order". I ...