tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Closed question in real analysis) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:02:21 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Will Jagy comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20802) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20802#Comment_20802 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20802#Comment_20802 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:46:45 -0800 Will Jagy Scott Carnahan comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20801) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20801#Comment_20801 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20801#Comment_20801 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:49:03 -0800 Scott Carnahan I'm not sure if this is just a language problem (although I did have to look up "infra dig").

The first version had a "Prove that" command in place of what is now a question. Also, the "We can provide details to the interested reader" part seems rather strange coming from an individual.

]]> Yemon Choi comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20800) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20800#Comment_20800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20800#Comment_20800 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:19:25 -0800 Yemon Choi This question doesn't seem obviously off-topic or "infra dig" to me...

]]>