tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique) 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher federico poloni comments on "Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique" (21893) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1543/intriguing-antiantispam-technique/?Focus=21893#Comment_21893 2013-04-18T07:17:55-07:00 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 federico poloni http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/589/ I already reported this trick on meta some months ago: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1413/manually-closing-questions/#Item_1 I already reported this trick on meta some months ago: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1413/manually-closing-questions/#Item_1

]]>
ykallus comments on "Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique" (21823) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1543/intriguing-antiantispam-technique/?Focus=21823#Comment_21823 2013-04-07T20:50:39-07:00 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 ykallus http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/756/ Could this recent question be related to the two recent questions by the user http://mathoverflow.net/users/32488/bill-dripps ? Zev Chonoles comments on "Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique" (21821) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1543/intriguing-antiantispam-technique/?Focus=21821#Comment_21821 2013-04-07T17:54:38-07:00 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 Zev Chonoles http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/123/ This tactic was just used on a recent question. It's not spam, though perhaps not of a high enough level for MO (I'm not sure I can judge). This tactic was just used on a recent question. It's not spam, though perhaps not of a high enough level for MO (I'm not sure I can judge).

]]>
grp comments on "Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique" (21471) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1543/intriguing-antiantispam-technique/?Focus=21471#Comment_21471 2013-02-25T08:35:13-08:00 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 grp http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/187/ That technique appeared on MathOverflow at least once before.The little I remember was that the question might have beenmarginal, but was more mathematical and noncommercial thansuggested by the ... The little I remember was that the question might have been
marginal, but was more mathematical and noncommercial than
suggested by the question Andrew mentions above.

I think that question got closed or ignored quickly enough, so
I am not too worried about its use. It's a good idea to make
more members aware of putting [closed] in titles, and probably
ending titles with "open?" will wear thin quickly.

Gerhard "Is Clopen A Question Status?" Paseman, 2013.02.25]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Intriguing anti-anti-spam technique" (21464) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1543/intriguing-antiantispam-technique/?Focus=21464#Comment_21464 2013-02-25T04:51:21-08:00 2018-11-04T12:59:09-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ This question hopefully won't be visible for that much longer (indeed, gone already), but I thought I'd bring to attention its title: [Closed] Huge Relief Unlock/Jailbreak iphone 5,4S,4 iOS 6.1.2 ... This question hopefully won't be visible for that much longer (indeed, gone already), but I thought I'd bring to attention its title:

[Closed] Huge Relief Unlock/Jailbreak iphone 5,4S,4 iOS 6.1.2 and iPad 4,3,2 Untehtered Produced

That [Closed] was put there by the original poster. The one that the software inserts is put at the end of the post. I suspect the idea was that folks would think it had already been closed and therefore not bother to click through and vote-to-close it.

Fortunately it looks like enough people voted it down to kick it off the site.

Anyway, I thought it a tactic worth noting so that people are aware of it. And to remember (not that it seems needed given the speed this one was dealt with) that even if a spam post is closed, there are other actions that can be taken that will speed its exit (though possibly not pursued by a bear) such as voting down and flagging as spam.

]]>