tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Adding relevant links to TeX-SX.) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:16:34 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Andrew Stacey comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14085) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14085#Comment_14085 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14085#Comment_14085 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 06:41:13 -0700 Andrew Stacey Given the number of times that I've done that, I'm tempted to suggest to the SE people that they register 'stackexchance' as an alias.

Thanks for the check.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14084) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14084#Comment_14084 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14084#Comment_14084 Mon, 11 Apr 2011 06:34:18 -0700 geraldedgar with your spelling exchance for exchange, the first link doesn't work...

]]>
José Figueroa comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14082) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14082#Comment_14082 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14082#Comment_14082 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:49:50 -0700 José Figueroa (N+1st)'d.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14080) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14080#Comment_14080 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14080#Comment_14080 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:04:22 -0700 Anton Geraschenko Thirded! (or fourthed?)

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14079) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14079#Comment_14079 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14079#Comment_14079 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:51:45 -0700 Scott Morrison Of course, it's a great idea. There's no reason the closed pages shouldn't be useful.

]]>
Noah Snyder comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14078) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14078#Comment_14078 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14078#Comment_14078 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:38:43 -0700 Noah Snyder Andrew Stacey comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14077) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14077#Comment_14077 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14077#Comment_14077 Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:14:17 -0700 Andrew Stacey This feels as though it should be okay, but I thought I'd mention it here in case there were any objections that I hadn't thought of. The question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/61227/how-to-write-a-multiple-choice-test-book-with-latex was closed with comments saying that it would fit better on http://tex.stackexchange.com. I saw that (presumably) the questioner took that advice and the question was asked there. So I added a link to the question on TeX-SX to the top of the question on MO, so that anyone who sees the question here will know where to go to on TeX-SX.

Is this acceptable behaviour? I'd only do it if the question was reposted, and probably only if it was closed here. If we were part of the SE2.0 network, this would have been migrated and there would have been a trail to follow to take you to the final resting place of the question, so I'm simply trying to do by hand what would have been done automatically.

]]>