tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Computational definitions for interesting complex functions) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:27:42 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher sigfpe comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6751) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6751#Comment_6751 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6751#Comment_6751 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:54:12 -0700 sigfpe Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6750) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6750#Comment_6750 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6750#Comment_6750 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:17:50 -0700 Harald Hanche-Olsen I think we may expect a seasonal variation in quality and quantity of questions. That said, I won't presume to make any predictions, nor can I tell if the recent spate of bad questions is a seasonal phenomenon. But I'll say that it is at least not unlikely.

]]> Steve Huntsman comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6749) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6749#Comment_6749 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6749#Comment_6749 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:42:18 -0700 Steve Huntsman Yemon Choi comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6745) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6745#Comment_6745 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6745#Comment_6745 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:27:10 -0700 Yemon Choi Noah Snyder comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6744) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6744#Comment_6744 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6744#Comment_6744 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:10:37 -0700 Noah Snyder Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6743) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6743#Comment_6743 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6743#Comment_6743 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:06:11 -0700 Qiaochu Yuan http://mathoverflow.net/questions/30961/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions doesn't seem to be a mathematical question to me.

More generally, we've been getting a lot of mediocre and/or off-topic questions lately. Is there anything we can do to force new users to read the FAQ? Something like redirecting to it immediately after registration.

]]>