tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Response to the questions) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:50:14 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16053) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16053#Comment_16053 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16053#Comment_16053 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:43:46 -0700 trustgod trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16052) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16052#Comment_16052 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16052#Comment_16052 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:42:36 -0700 trustgod Andres Caicedo comments on "Response to the questions" (16051) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16051#Comment_16051 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16051#Comment_16051 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:31:57 -0700 Andres Caicedo quid comments on "Response to the questions" (16050) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16050#Comment_16050 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16050#Comment_16050 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 03:31:00 -0700 quid trustgod (regarding the answer): Meanwhile, Gjergji Zaimi asked you something and you responded. However, for me your anwer in the comment is a bit too short [I am not an expert on this material, but then also confident to claim that my knoweldege on this is not below that of the average reader on math.SE]. Perhaps you could give a detailed and precise argument (on math.SE) for what you claim surely works; because this seems to be the key-point. Without this I am afraid the answer is perhaps not very helpful; I do not claim it is not correct just that I (and I assume I am not alone) cannot understand it in this form. In case you are worried the total length of your answer would then be too long, perhaps rather leave away some of the more general material. Thanks in adavnce!

]]>
Alex Bartel comments on "Response to the questions" (16049) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16049#Comment_16049 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16049#Comment_16049 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:54:59 -0700 Alex Bartel Just think what would happen if everybody who posts a question or an answer on MSE created a thread on meta.MO with the sole purpose of alerting people to the MSE post. That would make meta.MO completely unusable, I hope you agree. This thread is off topic and will hopefully be closed soon.

]]>
trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16048) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16048#Comment_16048 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16048#Comment_16048 Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:44:40 -0700 trustgod and by the way ,do you have any objection???,i think not,neither i am posting any harsh comments,neither i am claiming something,nor i am asking some advanced level questions,
and as MO meta is just for asking the suggestions ,i dont think i am prevented from this, ]]>
Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Response to the questions" (16047) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16047#Comment_16047 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16047#Comment_16047 Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:48:42 -0700 Qiaochu Yuan Why are you posting here if you were told not to come back to MO?

]]>
trustgod comments on "Response to the questions" (16046) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16046#Comment_16046 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1134/response-to-the-questions/?Focus=16046#Comment_16046 Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:00:10 -0700 trustgod and even though i got an answer ,it doesnt account for the exact Questions,rather it went outside ,but it was a good suggestion and i respect it and follow it ,
so i request the good people present in this community like Pete L.clark,Mark Sapir,David speyerTodd trimble,kevin Buzzard,Franz lemmermeyer,etc... to waste their valuable time and have a look over it ,and answer it,

and also i answered one question ,and i didnt get any comments ,can you please comment whether it was upto the mark or not,my answer was here
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21883/does-fermats-last-theorem-hold-for-cyclotomic-integers-in-mathbbq-zeta-37/62772#62772
thanks a lot ,to all seniors,
i am in debt with you all professors, ]]>