tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Is this Theorem known?) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:15:18 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Will Jagy comments on "Is this Theorem known?" (11224) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11224#Comment_11224 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11224#Comment_11224 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:59:08 -0800 Will Jagy
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/12364/integer-subset-that-only-occupies-p-1-2-equivalence-classes-mod-p

The OP never gave any detail, just kept saying that what people wrote was wrong. I was quite surprised to find out he has a Ph.D., all the signs pointed to an undergraduate keeping a big juicy secret close to his chest. I deleted my comments and my irrelevant answer. ]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Is this Theorem known?" (11223) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11223#Comment_11223 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11223#Comment_11223 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:48:38 -0800 Scott Morrison Yes, this is fine.

There is a slight danger with these questions: they could potentially provide "cover" for self promotion that we'd feel uncomfortable about. Certainly if it's asked as "There's this result I need, and which I know how to prove, but I'd really prefer if I can just cite something." then it's certainly okay. I think on the whole it's safe enough to just blanket approve this genre and deal with problematic cases on their merits.

]]>
Storkle comments on "Is this Theorem known?" (11222) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11222#Comment_11222 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11222#Comment_11222 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:08:17 -0800 Storkle Does "without success" in this context mean you've talked to people and the theorem you've proven is not known to them? Wouldn't that be success? Anyway, it's obviously appropriate to post such a question.

]]>
Pete L. Clark comments on "Is this Theorem known?" (11220) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11220#Comment_11220 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11220#Comment_11220 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:08:09 -0800 Pete L. Clark I think that this kind of question is acceptable on MO. It is absolutely the sort of question that a research mathematician would like to ask to a ready-made community of other research mathematicians, so it seems in the spirit of the site.

There is the point that it is hard to definitively answer "no" to such questions. But in this case the next best thing is to hear "no, I don't think so" from a leading expert, and MO can provide that.

Moreover, reference requests seem to be completely kosher. Isn't this a kind of reference request?

]]>
Martin B. comments on "Is this Theorem known?" (11214) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11214#Comment_11214 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/807/is-this-theorem-known/?Focus=11214#Comment_11214 Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:07:38 -0800 Martin B. If not, what other methods do you use? I've already tried to use MathSciNet and talked to some people, without success. ]]>