tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?)2018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
sisn comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15300)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15300#Comment_153002011-07-29T21:20:48-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00sisnhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/549/
yeah I did that- (but only after I read the etiquette section- by that time I had already added Eilenberg-MacLane-Axioms, Eilenberg-Steenrod-Axioms, and GRR).I wrote a comment proposing some changes, ...
I wrote a comment proposing some changes, and will check back on any feedback in a week or two... (by that time I hope to have worked out a blogpost on this) Thanks for your help.]]>
Ryan Budney comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15293)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15293#Comment_152932011-07-29T12:41:31-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00Ryan Budneyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/107/
Usually when changing a Wikipedia article, you put your suggestions on the "discussion" page first, and wait for feedback. If there's no objections after a while (a ...
You may also want to look at the revision history of the article. If there are only a few contributors, you can leave comments on their user-page, directing their attention to your comments on the discussion page.]]>
sisn comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15292)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15292#Comment_152922011-07-29T01:15:18-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00sisnhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/549/
Thanks for your suggestion- I think I will write a blog post about this topic in the next days.And maybe change the wikipedia article a bit, after that. Thanks!Simon
I think I will write a blog post about this topic in the next days. And maybe change the wikipedia article a bit, after that. Thanks! Simon]]>
Ryan Budney comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15289)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15289#Comment_152892011-07-28T21:38:30-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00Ryan Budneyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/107/
I also think it's best to contribute to the Wikipedia article rather than post such a thread on MO. If you'd like to draw attention to the Wikipedia article, you could add a comment to that effect ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics
You could also blog about the topic.]]>
sisn comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15288)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15288#Comment_152882011-07-28T21:23:17-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00sisnhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/549/
Yeah I figured that- that's why I asked first, Yeah I know that I could change the wikpedia timeline, but the idea of the question was more to find a "minimal list" agreed by a ...
Yeah I know that I could change the wikpedia timeline, but the idea of the question was more to find a "minimal list" agreed by a number of mathematicans (because I surely won't dare to claim to know what belongs /does not belong to a timeline of mathematics, just that the one given on wikipedia feels very inadequate]]>
Will Jagy comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15287)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15287#Comment_152872011-07-28T21:11:16-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00Will Jagyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/
It comes under the heading of subjective and argumentative. If you are unhappy with the wikipedia timeline you may register there and put in a few edits yourself.
sisn comments on "Timeline of mathematics- What sould be contained?" (15286)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1094/timeline-of-mathematics-what-sould-be-contained/?Focus=15286#Comment_152862011-07-28T20:54:16-07:002018-11-04T13:50:35-08:00sisnhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/549/
Does anyone know a good timeline of mathematics? Is this question acceptable? Maybe as a community wiki, so that a common ground on what should/should not be in a timeline can be found.This question ...
Is this question acceptable? Maybe as a community wiki, so that a common ground on what should/should not be in a timeline can be found. This question is much inspired by the timeline of mathematics on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_mathematics which I think is well pretty lets call it "special". No mention of Poincare (or topology), no mention of MacLane/Eilenberg or Cathegories and no mention of Grothendieck at all. Curiously it mentiones Connes NCG (which I think of course belongs, but without mentioning Grothendieck it is pretty strange.) Insteed it has two entries about Lotfi Zadeh's Fuzzy Sts/Fuzzy Logic (Which might be important- I don't know the first thing about it, but surely not more important than Poincare's Topology or Grothendieck remake of the AG Foundations.)- So in short I wondered weather It's possible to find an agreed minimal list which should constitute a timeline of mathematics. Do you think that this question is appropriate for mathoverflow?]]>