tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Survery on motivations) 2018-11-04T23:27:35-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher WillieWong comments on "Survery on motivations" (7348) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/525/survery-on-motivations/?Focus=7348#Comment_7348 2010-07-20T12:07:22-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:35-08:00 WillieWong http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/288/ Well, it has sort of moved here. http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/526/question-for-mathematics-researchers/#Item_4 I think Craig misunderstood Scott's invitation to "discuss it on ... Well, it has sort of moved here. http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/526/question-for-mathematics-researchers/#Item_4

I think Craig misunderstood Scott's invitation to "discuss it on Meta".

]]> Mariano comments on "Survery on motivations" (7333) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/525/survery-on-motivations/?Focus=7333#Comment_7333 2010-07-20T10:57:38-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:35-08:00 Mariano http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/61/ Indeed :) I'm surprised to see two other questions with the 'survey' tag, though. Indeed :)

I'm surprised to see two other questions with the 'survey' tag, though.

]]> Robin Chapman comments on "Survery on motivations" (7327) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/525/survery-on-motivations/?Focus=7327#Comment_7327 2010-07-20T10:46:09-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:35-08:00 Robin Chapman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/247/ When I tried to vote to close it, I found it had already been closed. Mariano comments on "Survery on motivations" (7326) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/525/survery-on-motivations/?Focus=7326#Comment_7326 2010-07-20T10:40:13-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:35-08:00 Mariano http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/61/ I am quite sure http://mathoverflow.net/questions/32660/question-for-mathematics-researchers is capable of atracting extraordinarily interesting answers... yet it does look a bit outside of the scope ... I am quite sure http://mathoverflow.net/questions/32660/question-for-mathematics-researchers is capable of atracting extraordinarily interesting answers... yet it does look a bit outside of the scope of MO, no?

]]>