tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes))2018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
François G. Dorais comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4705)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4705#Comment_47052010-04-11T15:38:40-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00François G. Doraishttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/
Aren't captchas discrimination against artificial intelligence? Since AI will have talents that are advantageous for certain types of math, we might consider being more welcoming... :)
Aren't captchas discrimination against artificial intelligence? Since AI will have talents that are advantageous for certain types of math, we might consider being more welcoming... :)
]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4704)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4704#Comment_47042010-04-11T14:22:19-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00Harry Gindihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/
To be honest, it really doesn't bother me. I don't really understand what kind of attack it's preventing against though, since it's certainly not doing anything against actual spam.
To be honest, it really doesn't bother me. I don't really understand what kind of attack it's preventing against though, since it's certainly not doing anything against actual spam.
]]>
David Speyer comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4703)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4703#Comment_47032010-04-11T14:17:26-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00David Speyerhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/23/
Think of it as a complement: you are a question-answering machine!
Think of it as a complement: you are a question-answering machine!
]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4698)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4698#Comment_46982010-04-11T11:29:24-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00Harry Gindihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/
It is also triggered when you try to do two edits in a row on a post.
It is also triggered when you try to do two edits in a row on a post.
]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4697)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4697#Comment_46972010-04-11T11:01:33-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00Anton Geraschenkohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/
The captcha is triggered when you take "too long" (20 minutes?) to compose/edit a post, which is silly. This has been corrected on S[OFU], but not in SE (yet). I posted a feature request on ...
The captcha is triggered when you take "too long" (20 minutes?) to compose/edit a post, which is silly. This has been corrected on S[OFU], but not in SE (yet). I posted a feature request on meta.SE to raise/remove this upper time limit.
]]>
fedja comments on "Yes, I am a human being (at least, for MO posting purposes)" (4691)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/346/yes-i-am-a-human-being-at-least-for-mo-posting-purposes/?Focus=4691#Comment_46912010-04-10T22:44:34-07:002018-11-04T13:47:25-08:00fedjahttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/29/
This verification actually acts on my nerves. I was checked 3 times today and that isn't the record. Is it possible to disable it for the registered users with at least 1K reputation?