tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis)

Scott Morrison comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20861)

2012-12-17T00:56:30-08:00

(Also, posting on vixra and in the general mathematics tag on the arxiv are bad ways to establish credibility.)

Scott Morrison comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20860)

2012-12-17T00:55:36-08:00

In case zeraoulia is still here: people are welcome to have multiple accounts on MathOverflow, as long as those accounts never interact, and in particular never vote for each other or correspond on the same question. Please be careful! Further, anonymous users should not expect to receive the benefit of doubt in borderline cases, making me sympathetic to voloch's suggestion that having used multiple accounts makes each individual post more readily considered spam.

Andy Putman comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20839)

2012-12-15T11:41:43-08:00

I agree with voloch.

voloch comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20837)

2012-12-15T11:36:03-08:00

I think zeraoulia and RH posts border on spam, even more so if they are the same user.

quid comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20833)

2012-12-15T10:23:59-08:00

@Yemon Choi: I do not think zeraoulia wanted to actively obfuscated the connection to user RH; the other thread is essentially a repost of a comment on main (to me) in the question this thread is about. (Added: the respective answer got delted via flags so it is not generally visible anymore.)

Yemon Choi comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20832)

2012-12-15T10:08:22-08:00

Let me just note that page 6 of the arXiv link indicates to me that zeraoulia is this user who used to have a more honest or descriptive user profile IIRC. There was a deleted question about the arguments of complex numbers which seems to render all the questions about L-functions etc somewhat beside the point. Cf. also this question

And yes, I think this thread should be closed.

Todd Trimble comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20829)

2012-12-15T09:41:57-08:00

Well, if you're certain it's fine, zeraoulia, then what need do you have of the opinions of others?

(Do others think this thread could be closed now?)

zeraoulia comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20828)

2012-12-15T09:06:12-08:00

Can you see my solution at:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1210.0176v6.pdf

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1517v9.pdf

Certainly this is a fine solution. Please let me know about your opinion on it.

HJRW comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20822)

2012-12-14T13:56:38-08:00

It's closed now.

Andy Putman comments on "Let's close the question about approaches to the Riemann hypothesis" (20820)

2012-12-14T13:27:03-08:00

The question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34699/approaches-to-riemann-hypothesis-using-methods-outside-number-theory seems to attract a huge number of low-quality answers (counting things that were deleted as spam, I count 6 worthless answers). I also rather doubt that anything genuinely new is going to show up. Let's put it out of its misery.