tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Why is a ring called a "ring"?)2018-11-04T13:01:52-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Joseph O'Rourke comments on "Why is a ring called a "ring"?" (21029)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1499/why-is-a-ring-called-a-ring/?Focus=21029#Comment_210292012-12-27T05:41:40-08:002018-11-04T13:01:52-08:00Joseph O'Rourkehttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/240/
As I remarked in a late comment, what triggered this question was a piece by David Mumford (in "The Best Writing on Mathematics: 2012"), in which he says: "I have no idea why, but when ...
As I remarked in a late comment, what triggered this question was a piece by David Mumford (in "The Best Writing on Mathematics: 2012"), in which he says: "I have no idea why, but when you have any set of things that [...], mathematicians call this set a ring." I looked it up in Wikipedia and did not find that explanation truly explanatory. I am sorry to cause this bit of trouble, but it has evoked an erudite answer by quid, for which I am grateful.
]]>
grp comments on "Why is a ring called a "ring"?" (21027)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1499/why-is-a-ring-called-a-ring/?Focus=21027#Comment_210272012-12-26T21:13:46-08:002018-11-04T13:01:52-08:00grphttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/187/
Although technically not a duplicate of "origins of names of algebraic structures", if Joseph O'Rourke had searched for zahlring on MathOverflow, I think he would have found his ...
Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2012.12.26]]>
François G. Dorais comments on "Why is a ring called a "ring"?" (21026)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1499/why-is-a-ring-called-a-ring/?Focus=21026#Comment_210262012-12-26T19:55:46-08:002018-11-04T13:01:52-08:00François G. Doraishttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/
Question 117292 has just been closed. I don't think this closure is entirely inappropriate but it clearly needs to be discussed.
Question 117292 has just been closed. I don't think this closure is entirely inappropriate but it clearly needs to be discussed.
]]>