tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (ra.rings-and-algebras vs. ra.rings-algebras) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:43:02 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Anton Geraschenko comments on "ra.rings-and-algebras vs. ra.rings-algebras" (1386) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/129/raringsandalgebras-vs-raringsalgebras/?Focus=1386#Comment_1386 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/129/raringsandalgebras-vs-raringsalgebras/?Focus=1386#Comment_1386 Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:59:11 -0800 Anton Geraschenko I've changed the bottom of the ask/edit to be [ra.rings-and-algebras].

]]> Ben Webster comments on "ra.rings-and-algebras vs. ra.rings-algebras" (1384) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/129/raringsandalgebras-vs-raringsalgebras/?Focus=1384#Comment_1384 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/129/raringsandalgebras-vs-raringsalgebras/?Focus=1384#Comment_1384 Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:52:01 -0800 Ben Webster the tag in common usage and the name listed at the bottom of the edit page don't match up. I don't have strong opiions either way, but I feel like they should match.

]]>