tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Should this question be re-opened?) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:24:17 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Tony Huynh comments on "Should this question be re-opened?" (9280) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9280#Comment_9280 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9280#Comment_9280 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:27:01 -0700 Tony Huynh @jbl: Yes, once you have enough reputation to vote (3000) you can see the number of votes already cast.

]]>
jbl comments on "Should this question be re-opened?" (9278) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9278#Comment_9278 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9278#Comment_9278 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:21:42 -0700 jbl I don't know if the votes were already there when I made my suggestion (I guess one can only see votes in progress when one already has enough reputation to vote?) but the revised question seems worth re-opening to me, hence the suggestion.

]]>
Yemon Choi comments on "Should this question be re-opened?" (9277) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9277#Comment_9277 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9277#Comment_9277 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:21:38 -0700 Yemon Choi I think the question is now much better and admits more well-defined "good answers". Casting the 5th vote to re-open... now!

]]>
Tony Huynh comments on "Should this question be re-opened?" (9276) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9276#Comment_9276 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/687/should-this-question-be-reopened/?Focus=9276#Comment_9276 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:13:05 -0700 Tony Huynh The question Examples of theorems arising from many authors' work by Colin Reid has been rewritten (actually its title has been rewritten too). To me, the question seems fine now, and there are currently four votes to reopen (including mine). JBL suggested that a meta-thread be set up to discuss the appropriateness of the revised question, and I am that meta-thread.

Here is a link to the question at hand.

]]>