tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (MO's ssl-certificate is slightly problematic) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:18:41 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher peter.krautzberger comments on "MO's ssl-certificate is slightly problematic" (11904) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11904#Comment_11904 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11904#Comment_11904 Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:29:47 -0800 peter.krautzberger
Anton's link addresses the question of automatic ssl-encryption (in short: SO doesn't want to spend money on it).

What irritated me was that it works! That is, if you manually go to https://mathoverflow.net you will get an encrypted connection. The only problem is that most browsers will (and should) complain that the certificate does not match the domain. So even though SO does not want to offer automatic encryption (which is unfortunate), they do offer 'manual' encryption, but without giving MO its own certificate.

Ah, on second thought/test, SO's certificate is almost as problematic since it's untrusted by firefox and chrome... Nevermind then. ]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "MO's ssl-certificate is slightly problematic" (11901) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11901#Comment_11901 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11901#Comment_11901 Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:15:38 -0800 Andrew Stacey See http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/798/mo-and-metamo-over-ssl, and in particular the link in Anton's comment there.

]]>
peter.krautzberger comments on "MO's ssl-certificate is slightly problematic" (11887) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11887#Comment_11887 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/840/mos-sslcertificate-is-slightly-problematic/?Focus=11887#Comment_11887 Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:24:01 -0800 peter.krautzberger
It turns out the ssl-certificate for mathoverflow is actually created for stackoverflow. Maybe the SO-overlords can give MO its own certificate?

If I might add, I think it would be great if ssl-encryption was standard (cf. the efforts of https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ). After all, MO lives and dies with its users, so it would make sense to protect their privacy in this unobtrusive manner (well, if it's not too difficult technically). ]]>