tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (ambiguous/overloaded tags) 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4649) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4649#Comment_4649 2010-04-09T00:23:45-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me? Because that bumps the ...

Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me?

Because that bumps the questions to the top of the home page.

I'll go with the solution Jonas proposed, but I reserve the right to merge unwanted tags into [tag-removed]. Rather than blocking this tag, you should simply remove it from the question whenever you see it at the top of the home page. If a question is really awful (and hence doesn't have any other tags at all, so you can't remove [tag-removed]), then it won't ever get bumped because everybody will ignore it, so you won't see it anyway. I don't see any reason to have [tag-removed] in your ignored list.

]]>
Jonas Meyer comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4648) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4648#Comment_4648 2010-04-09T00:12:22-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Jonas Meyer http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/87/ If I counted correctly, all but 2 of the questions tagged [algebraic] are also tagged [algebraic-geometry]. How about removing those 2 manually and merging the rest into [algebraic-geometry], so ... Harry Gindi comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4647) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4647#Comment_4647 2010-04-08T23:06:14-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Harry Gindi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/ Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me? Why don't you just strip the tags off and let the tag die by itself. I have [tag-removed] blocked, so won't your approach make all of those questions invisible to me?

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4646) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4646#Comment_4646 2010-04-08T22:53:14-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ It looks like every question tagged [algebraic] also has meaningful tags. I propose merging [algebraic] into [tag-removed]. Can anybody think of any possible objections? rwbarton comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4645) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4645#Comment_4645 2010-04-08T21:12:01-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 rwbarton http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/6/ There is a tag [algebraic] whose purpose I cannot discern--maybe it is accidental. Anyways, it doesn't seem like a good part of speech to be a tag name. Sonia Balagopalan comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4603) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4603#Comment_4603 2010-04-07T07:48:40-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Sonia Balagopalan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/15/ @fpqc: Exactly. But some questions in both the disc-geom and comb-geom tags could do with retagging as the other, and some should be tagged [finite-geometry]. I don't have the rep, so if someone ... But some questions in both the disc-geom and comb-geom tags could do with retagging as the other, and some should be tagged [finite-geometry]. I don't have the rep, so if someone could oblige?]]> François G. Dorais comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4601) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4601#Comment_4601 2010-04-07T07:45:21-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 François G. Dorais http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/ @Steve, metric geometry was actually what I wanted to ask about in this old thread on "What is ...?" questions. I think tag ambiguity is often enough an issue that it needs to be looked ... @Steve, metric geometry was actually what I wanted to ask about in this old thread on "What is ...?" questions. I think tag ambiguity is often enough an issue that it needs to be looked into, but I don't have any good ideas how to fix this problem.

@Mark, I found that page helpful from time to time, but it doesn't seem to match common usage. For example, I've seen the tag [mg.metric-geometry] deleted and replaced by [discrete-geometry] when the latter is listed under math.MG. I honestly don't know enough about MG to determine what's right and what's wrong, but this particular tag has been very puzzling to me.

]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4599) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4599#Comment_4599 2010-04-07T07:36:17-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Harry Gindi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/ I actually posted something in [combinatorial-geometry] about simplicial sets, and they definitely do not fit in discrete or finite geometry, even though they are combinatorial and geometric objects. I actually posted something in [combinatorial-geometry] about simplicial sets, and they definitely do not fit in discrete or finite geometry, even though they are combinatorial and geometric objects.

]]>
Mark Meckes comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4598) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4598#Comment_4598 2010-04-07T07:35:19-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Mark Meckes http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/132/ @Steve: http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/categories/mathNot completely informative, but a good start.
Not completely informative, but a good start.]]>
Sonia Balagopalan comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (4597) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=4597#Comment_4597 2010-04-07T07:30:16-07:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Sonia Balagopalan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/15/ We have [discrete-geometry] and [combinatorial-geometry] tags (which could do with some differentiating), but no [finite-geometry] tag. Admittedly there is a big overlap, but there is also ... Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3727) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3727#Comment_3727 2010-03-08T00:51:19-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ Yeah, I'm not gonna do it. But it would be helpful if someone would. Jonas Meyer comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3718) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3718#Comment_3718 2010-03-07T17:00:08-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Jonas Meyer http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/87/ I would suggest not retagging if it isn't clear what the tags are supposed to cover. Perhaps a geometer will stop by and clarify? Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3717) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3717#Comment_3717 2010-03-07T16:18:37-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ I'm also wondering about retagging a lot of "geometry" stuff. It's not entirely clear to me what the metric geometry arxiv classification is supposed to cover, but I bet it's ... Anton Geraschenko comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3686) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3686#Comment_3686 2010-03-05T18:09:18-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @Steve re [ordinary-differential-equations]: There is a character limit on tags, so it would automatically be shortened to [ordinary-differential-equ]. btw, if you have enough rep to vote on ... @Steve re [ordinary-differential-equations]: There is a character limit on tags, so it would automatically be shortened to [ordinary-differential-equ].

btw, if you have enough rep to vote on meta.SE, please vote up Scott's request to extend the character limit on tags if you haven't already done so.

]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3675) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3675#Comment_3675 2010-03-05T12:35:05-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ @Reid: Thanks for the heads-up. I retagged what I did mainly because it was easy and quick, didn't think about the front page since I always look at the new questions and not the actives (will keep ... rwbarton comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3673) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3673#Comment_3673 2010-03-05T11:38:58-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 rwbarton http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/6/ @Steve: I haven't been following your retagging, so I don't know whether it's applicable here, but in case you're not aware: the moderators have the ability to merge/rename tags, i.e., replace all ...
There is a thread for such requests here: http://tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/34/2/tag-mergerename-reqests/]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3670) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3670#Comment_3670 2010-03-05T09:05:02-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ @Scott: I think your merger is the better of the two possibilities. I'd also like to see if we can reach consensus on turning "differential-equations" to ... Scott Morrison comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3669) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3669#Comment_3669 2010-03-05T08:56:09-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ I've just merged [ca.classical-analysis-ode] to [ca.classical-analysis]. Let me know if I should switch it the other way. The proper name is "Classical Analysis and ODEs", and we don't ... I've just merged [ca.classical-analysis-ode] to [ca.classical-analysis]. Let me know if I should switch it the other way. The proper name is "Classical Analysis and ODEs", and we don't otherwise abbreviate, but as the shorter tag already predominated (well, 17 to 10), I went with that.

I agree that many of the analysis and differential-equations tags should be replaced. Let me know if there are any tag merges that need a moderator, but it seems unfortunately that this requires by-hand attention.

]]>
Steve Huntsman comments on "ambiguous/overloaded tags" (3668) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/268/ambiguousoverloaded-tags/?Focus=3668#Comment_3668 2010-03-05T08:36:24-08:00 2018-11-04T13:47:28-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ So I just retagged all the "k-theory" questions with "kt.k-theory-homology" but I realized that there are quite a few "analysis" and ...
tl;dr--"analysis" and "differential-equations" are overloaded/overused/ambiguous, many should be replaced with arxiv and/or ODE tags. Also, the two "ca.*" tags should be merged. Thoughts?]]>