In particular, the worry beneath Harry and Kevin's observation is: what happens if someone does post an answer on MO that solves said thesis problem? Sure it is unlikely to happen. But is it a good idea to risk it?
]]>One can waste entirely too much time trying to figure out how to compare degrees across international boundaries.
]]>Also, in my naivity, I want to believe two things: (1) If a question, technical and unmotivated, can be solved quickly by MO, then it probably won't qualify as a (good) thesis topic anyway and (2) (especially for the Masters thesis) sometimes even just understanding what the expert told you and writing it down in a sensible way is good training toward research.
So I wouldn't worry too much about this possible abuse.
]]>Here is a related question that I have been wanting to ask for a while. The existence of MO raises a new ethical issue which will become more common in my opinion. A lot of people around the world will realize that substantial progress on Master or even PhD thesis can be made just by asking questions on MO. It may have happened already, I have noticed a few users with a lot of related questions without motivations. And most of them are anonymous! What would be our community consensus on this matter?
]]>