tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Minor edits) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:17:43 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Unknown G. comments on "Minor edits" (5463) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5463#Comment_5463 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5463#Comment_5463 Fri, 07 May 2010 15:23:07 -0700 Unknown G.
Thank you very much for your answer! ]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Minor edits" (5461) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5461#Comment_5461 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5461#Comment_5461 Fri, 07 May 2010 15:16:00 -0700 Scott Morrison @Unknown G.,

you are very welcome to make minor edits to your questions, and especially encouraged to do so if you will otherwise be annoyed!

Bumping a question to the front page isn't entirely a bad thing. I don't mind that the extra attention you put into your question (cleaning up typos, improving phrasing, etc) results in some extra attention on the part of others, answering it. Of course it's a grey area, where the unacceptable behaviour can only really be distinguished from acceptable behaviour by intent, not means. The fact that you're being cautious about this issue almost certainly means you're being too cautious. (Those who take the time to read the rules, generally don't need to...)

]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "Minor edits" (5459) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5459#Comment_5459 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5459#Comment_5459 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:40:42 -0700 Harry Gindi Regenbogen comments on "Minor edits" (5458) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5458#Comment_5458 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5458#Comment_5458 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:33:53 -0700 Regenbogen Of course, it is not a good idea to make 50 or 100 edits to your posts and that would be bad etiquette. Otherwise, unless the number of edits is very high, it is better to correct an error, even a minor one, than to leave it as it is.

]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "Minor edits" (5457) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5457#Comment_5457 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5457#Comment_5457 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:30:58 -0700 Harry Gindi Unknown G. comments on "Minor edits" (5456) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5456#Comment_5456 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/394/minor-edits/?Focus=5456#Comment_5456 Fri, 07 May 2010 12:16:27 -0700 Unknown G.
However, as time passes by I get more and more annoyed by seeing these minor errors/bad choices of phrasing, and I'd really like to know whether making minor edits is legitimate in MO. Of course, I'm not talking about a burst of edits (say, at least one week between minor edits). ]]>