tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Computational definitions for interesting complex functions) 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher sigfpe comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6751) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6751#Comment_6751 2010-07-07T19:54:12-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 sigfpe http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/69/ Well if there was something on the front page saying what purpose this web site is intended to serve... Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6750) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6750#Comment_6750 2010-07-07T19:17:50-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 Harald Hanche-Olsen http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/18/ I think we may expect a seasonal variation in quality and quantity of questions. That said, I won't presume to make any predictions, nor can I tell if the recent spate of bad questions is a seasonal ... I think we may expect a seasonal variation in quality and quantity of questions. That said, I won't presume to make any predictions, nor can I tell if the recent spate of bad questions is a seasonal phenomenon. But I'll say that it is at least not unlikely.

]]> Steve Huntsman comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6749) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6749#Comment_6749 2010-07-07T18:42:18-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 Steve Huntsman http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/110/ Seemed to me like there was some decline back in the spring. Yemon Choi comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6745) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6745#Comment_6745 2010-07-07T18:27:10-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 Yemon Choi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/ Short of making the "READ THE MUGGER-LUMPING FAQ" message bigger and more annoying, I'm not sure what can be done... Unless one could set things up so that the rest of the screen ... Noah Snyder comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6744) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6744#Comment_6744 2010-07-07T18:10:37-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 Noah Snyder http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/59/ I agree that this is not a good question and voted to close. I also agree that for some reason we've had quite an increase in questions that are of much too low a level. Do we know where the new ... Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Computational definitions for interesting complex functions" (6743) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/491/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions/?Focus=6743#Comment_6743 2010-07-07T17:06:11-07:00 2018-11-04T23:27:43-08:00 Qiaochu Yuan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/13/ http://mathoverflow.net/questions/30961/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions doesn't seem to be a mathematical question to me. More generally, we've been getting a lot of ... http://mathoverflow.net/questions/30961/computational-definitions-for-interesting-complex-functions doesn't seem to be a mathematical question to me.

More generally, we've been getting a lot of mediocre and/or off-topic questions lately. Is there anything we can do to force new users to read the FAQ? Something like redirecting to it immediately after registration.

]]>