tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Locally Isomorphic Modules)2018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
SteveLandsburg comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21037)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21037#Comment_210372012-12-27T17:02:07-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00SteveLandsburghttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/673/
I do not agree that Fernando Muro's comment should count as "easy" in this context; it requires knowledge of more topology than the typical reader of a graduate algebra textbook is ...
Andreas Blass comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21036)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21036#Comment_210362012-12-27T16:57:30-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00Andreas Blasshttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/475/
Since András Bátkai asked for comments here from those who voted to close: I voted to close because Fernando Muro's comment had given an easy negative answer to the question, and Steven Landsburg's ...
Mariano comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21033)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21033#Comment_210332012-12-27T11:49:40-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00Marianohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/61/
With luck, someone will add a concrete example, it can be accepted and forgot :-)
With luck, someone will add a concrete example, it can be accepted and forgot :-)
]]>
Chris Godsil comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21032)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21032#Comment_210322012-12-27T11:05:29-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00Chris Godsilhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/682/
I agree with your reasoning, and your decision.
Angelo comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21031)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21031#Comment_210312012-12-27T08:27:31-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00Angelohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/483/
I agree.
Todd Trimble comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21030)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21030#Comment_210302012-12-27T07:41:59-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00Todd Trimblehttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/411/
My opinion: sure, it's on-topic.
My opinion: sure, it's on-topic.
]]>
SteveLandsburg comments on "Locally Isomorphic Modules" (21028)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1500/locally-isomorphic-modules/?Focus=21028#Comment_210282012-12-27T05:31:07-08:002018-11-04T13:01:44-08:00SteveLandsburghttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/673/
Re this question: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117312/locally-isomorphic-modules/117324#117324I started to vote to close this as off-topic for being sub-research level. But the FAQ says (I'm ...
I started to vote to close this as off-topic for being sub-research level. But the FAQ says (I'm paraphrasing from memory) that questions are on-topic when they're the sort of thing you'd ask when reading graduate level math books. By that criterion, this seems to me to be on topic; it's a natural question to ask when reading a graduate level algebra book, the natural counterexamples requiring more topology than many such readers are likely to have encountered. In particular, I don't think it would be embarrassing for a second-year graduate student to ask this question in the coffee room. So instead of voting to close, I answered it --- but it was a close call. I'm wondering what others think.]]>