tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Preview in meta forum software is also misleading) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:44:13 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Scott Morrison comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (670) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=670#Comment_670 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=670#Comment_670 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:58:57 -0800 Scott Morrison Scott Morrison comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (669) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=669#Comment_669 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=669#Comment_669 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:58:50 -0800 Scott Morrison David Speyer comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (660) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=660#Comment_660 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=660#Comment_660 Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:54:10 -0800 David Speyer I agree, let's turn it off.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (649) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=649#Comment_649 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=649#Comment_649 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:23:43 -0800 Andrew Stacey Given that you don't use it, I'd advise turning it off. I'd be quite interesting in knowing why it didn't work, but that's probably an email discussion than a forum discussion.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (647) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=647#Comment_647 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=647#Comment_647 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:02:11 -0800 Anton Geraschenko This is because when we set up meta.MO, we didn't ever get mathematical markup working. Since we don't ever write math here, I think we should just turn off our half-baked attempt.

A workaround: when you want a $, type $

]]>
David Speyer comments on "Preview in meta forum software is also misleading" (644) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=644#Comment_644 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/63/preview-in-meta-forum-software-is-also-misleading/?Focus=644#Comment_644 Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:10:19 -0800 David Speyer
Set "Format comments as text." Type SSa=bSS, except with the capital S's replaced by dollar signs. I have done this below

<latex>a=b</latex>

In the preview, they are displayed as dollarsigns (as I would expect, since markdown is turned off.) But, when you save changes, the first double dollar sign is changed to "<latex>" and the second to "</latex>". Moreover, this is not just a display problem; if you go back and edit the post, the double dollar signs will be changed there too! (To my mind, this is terrible design. Sanitize my input however you want for display and processing, but store my original characters, dammit!)

I have tried using Markdown's code setting as a work-around, but I couldn't find a way to get this to work either. At the moment, I have no idea how to get you to see the string of characters that would be obtained in a normal text editor by hitting "Shift-4, Shift-4, a, =, b, Shift-4, Shift-4". ]]>