tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox)2018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
fedja comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (20533)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=20533#Comment_205332012-11-14T18:20:42-08:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00fedjahttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/29/
Those are mainly bots, which are normally rather stupid but pretty persistent. To write a good spamming program takes skills and those who have skills usually find something more interesting to do ...
DavidRoberts comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (20532)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=20532#Comment_205322012-11-14T16:55:52-08:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00DavidRobertshttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/588/
Always amusing when spammers can't figure out markdown such that they don't even get pagerank inflation :-)
Always amusing when spammers can't figure out markdown such that they don't even get pagerank inflation :-)
]]>
Andreas Blass comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (20531)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=20531#Comment_205312012-11-14T13:55:24-08:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00Andreas Blasshttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/475/
It seems the spammers have found meta.mathoverflow. Could a moderator please delete the post from TAMARAOlson28?
François G. Dorais comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (19643)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=19643#Comment_196432012-08-12T19:05:50-07:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00François G. Doraishttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/
The initial upvote and downvote were (nearly) simultaneous. I suspect that may have caused a glitch.
The initial upvote and downvote were (nearly) simultaneous. I suspect that may have caused a glitch.
]]>
François G. Dorais comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (19642)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=19642#Comment_196422012-08-12T18:53:30-07:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00François G. Doraishttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/
I had reopened it while playing around. I just undeleted it. (Here is the revision history: http://dev.mathoverflow.stackexchange.com/posts/103744/revisions)
I had reopened it while playing around. I just undeleted it. (Here is the revision history: http://dev.mathoverflow.stackexchange.com/posts/103744/revisions)
]]>
Joel Reyes Noche comments on "Experimenting with MO 2.0 sandbox" (19640)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1419/experimenting-with-mo-20-sandbox/?Focus=19640#Comment_196402012-08-12T17:43:47-07:002018-11-04T13:03:09-08:00Joel Reyes Nochehttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/601/
I asked this question 19 hours ago: http://dev.mathoverflow.stackexchange.com/questions/103744/what-is-the-questionIt had been closed before, and when I tried to delete it (while it was closed), the ...
It had been closed before, and when I tried to delete it (while it was closed), the software stated that I could only delete it after 2 days. When I looked again just a few minutes ago, it apparently had been reopened. I added a comment that it seems that the question has had three downvotes and two upvotes, but that its score was 0 (instead of -1). Then I tried to delete the question again (just playing around), and for some reason it actually was deleted. I expected that I would be able to go back to the question and undelete it, but it seems that I have no access to it anymore.]]>