tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer)

geraldedgar comments on "Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer" (19911)

2012-08-23T07:27:27-07:00

So, will we have a contest, people bumping their own questions to the front?

Actually, I have no objection to doing it once a year or so...

Gerry Myerson comments on "Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer" (19910)

2012-08-23T05:20:06-07:00

I think it is legitimate to edit to bump a question, so long as it's done in moderation. You could make an inconsequential edit, but it might be better to make an edit pointing out that there are conflicting answers, and encouraging expert opinion.

davidac897 comments on "Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer" (19909)

2012-08-23T00:48:24-07:00

Hmm, I also have editing power, but is that legit?

DavidRoberts comments on "Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer" (19907)

2012-08-22T23:18:18-07:00

Correct link: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/3910/.

I could edit the question inconsequentially if you like to bump it to the front page....

davidac897 comments on "Looking for an answer on an old question without a satisfactory answer" (19906)

2012-08-22T22:59:06-07:00

I'm curious to hear an answer to http://mathoverflow.net/questions/3910/primary-decomposition-for-modules. So far, two people have posted, both giving opposite answers, and there's been no conclusion. One answer has more up-votes, but I'm leaning on the second answer. The question is in some sense a yes-or-no question: which definition is the right one?

My sense is that few people have looked at this question and that IF more people, especially experts, looked at it, one answer would clearly emerge as the correct one.

Am I missing something, or is there no way to bump a question back?