Unless the counterexample is posted as a comment.
]]>As a jumping off point, let me point out something I just did: * I asked a question about whether a particular statement was true. * A very nice counter-example was posted. * I realized that the counter-example was precisely based around a piece of wiggle room that doesn't exist in my situation, and thus was left with a dilemma. The counter-example perfectly answered the question I had asked, but not the one I should have. * I opted to ask a second question which was almost exactly the same, but had a new hypothesis making the old answer inapplicable. (And, of course, provided links between the questions).
So here's where I ask your collective opinion...did I do right?
]]>