tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake) 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Will Jagy comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19165) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19165#Comment_19165 2012-05-29T17:44:14-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 Will Jagy http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/ Yemon, did you perhaps meanMust we raise the dead, for umlaut's sake ...Eats, shoots, and leaves...
Must we raise the dead, for umlaut's sake


...Eats, shoots, and leaves...]]>
Gerry Myerson comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19164) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19164#Comment_19164 2012-05-29T16:10:07-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 Gerry Myerson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/370/ @ykallus, no, I think there's no way to edit even tags without bumping. My advice: 1. Start a meta thread on that namespace conflict and your proposed resolution. Then, if you reckon a consensus ...
1. Start a meta thread on that namespace conflict and your proposed resolution. Then, if you reckon a consensus develops on how to handle the conflict,

2. Re-tag two or three questions a day until they're all done.

Perhaps I should have started with

0. Check to see whether this particular conflict has already been discussed in meta.]]>
ykallus comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19162) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19162#Comment_19162 2012-05-29T14:57:29-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 ykallus http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/756/ While on this topic, I was wondering if there is a way to edit questions without bumping them to the front page. I have been slightly annoyed by the namespace conflict between lattices (algebraic ... voloch comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19161) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19161#Comment_19161 2012-05-29T13:42:04-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 voloch http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/211/ If anything, Scott's email seemed to have had the opposite effect. Scott Morrison comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19160) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19160#Comment_19160 2012-05-29T11:13:19-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ I've sent a brief email, reminding the Pietro that one needs to find a balance between correcting minor problems and preserving the usefulness of the front page. I'll certainly admit to obsessing ... I've sent a brief email, reminding the Pietro that one needs to find a balance between correcting minor problems and preserving the usefulness of the front page. I'll certainly admit to obsessing about commas sometimes, so I find it hard to be too upset.

]]>
Yemon Choi comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19157) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19157#Comment_19157 2012-05-29T08:31:53-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 Yemon Choi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/ I'm almost tempted to revert each "Hölder" If I were feeling crankier, or bölder. I'm almost tempted to revert each "Hölder"

If I were feeling crankier, or bölder.

]]>
Yemon Choi comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19156) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19156#Comment_19156 2012-05-29T08:29:52-07:00 2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00 Yemon Choi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/ I don't know how much bumping I can take. Worse uncorrected details pass unrighted This zeal for fixing spelling? Not delighted. I don't know how much bumping I can take.

Worse uncorrected details pass unrighted

This zeal for fixing spelling? Not delighted.

]]>