tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake)2018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Will Jagy comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19165)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19165#Comment_191652012-05-29T17:44:14-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00Will Jagyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/
Yemon, did you perhaps meanMust we raise the dead, for umlaut's sake ...Eats, shoots, and leaves...
Must we raise the dead, for umlaut's sake
...Eats, shoots, and leaves...]]>
Gerry Myerson comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19164)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19164#Comment_191642012-05-29T16:10:07-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00Gerry Myersonhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/370/
@ykallus, no, I think there's no way to edit even tags without bumping. My advice: 1. Start a meta thread on that namespace conflict and your proposed resolution. Then, if you reckon a consensus ...
1. Start a meta thread on that namespace conflict and your proposed resolution. Then, if you reckon a consensus develops on how to handle the conflict,
2. Re-tag two or three questions a day until they're all done.
Perhaps I should have started with
0. Check to see whether this particular conflict has already been discussed in meta.]]>
ykallus comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19162)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19162#Comment_191622012-05-29T14:57:29-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00ykallushttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/756/
While on this topic, I was wondering if there is a way to edit questions without bumping them to the front page. I have been slightly annoyed by the namespace conflict between lattices (algebraic ...
voloch comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19161)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19161#Comment_191612012-05-29T13:42:04-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00volochhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/211/
If anything, Scott's email seemed to have had the opposite effect.
Scott Morrison comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19160)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19160#Comment_191602012-05-29T11:13:19-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00Scott Morrisonhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/
I've sent a brief email, reminding the Pietro that one needs to find a balance between correcting minor problems and preserving the usefulness of the front page. I'll certainly admit to obsessing ...
I've sent a brief email, reminding the Pietro that one needs to find a balance between correcting minor problems and preserving the usefulness of the front page. I'll certainly admit to obsessing about commas sometimes, so I find it hard to be too upset.
]]>
Yemon Choi comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19157)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19157#Comment_191572012-05-29T08:31:53-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00Yemon Choihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/
I'm almost tempted to revert each "Hölder"
If I were feeling crankier, or bölder.
I'm almost tempted to revert each "Hölder"
If I were feeling crankier, or bölder.
]]>
Yemon Choi comments on "Must we raise the dead for umlaut's sake" (19156)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1374/must-we-raise-the-dead-for-umlauts-sake/?Focus=19156#Comment_191562012-05-29T08:29:52-07:002018-11-04T13:33:48-08:00Yemon Choihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/
I don't know how much bumping I can take.
Worse uncorrected details pass unrighted
This zeal for fixing spelling? Not delighted.
I don't know how much bumping I can take.