tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?)2018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
David Speyer comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14516)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14516#Comment_145162011-05-16T05:16:06-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00David Speyerhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/23/
I e-mailed Juliana Tymoczko and Rebecca Goldin about this three weeks ago. Rebecca said she would check with AIM; I haven't heard back since.
Harry Gindi comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14515)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14515#Comment_145152011-05-16T00:32:31-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00Harry Gindihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/
That was the first time I'd ever seen it used outside a technical mathematical context. It was an expression of delight at seeing something new, not a correction, whence came the "=D" face ...
That was the first time I'd ever seen it used outside a technical mathematical context. It was an expression of delight at seeing something new, not a correction, whence came the "=D" face of excitement!
]]>
Scott Carnahan comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14511)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14511#Comment_145112011-05-15T20:29:16-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00Scott Carnahanhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/73/
Harry, this is not a grammar forum. Please do not bring that up again.
Harry, this is not a grammar forum. Please do not bring that up again.
]]>
Harry Gindi comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14504)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14504#Comment_145042011-05-15T14:50:50-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00Harry Gindihttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/55/
Associated to? =D
Associated to? =D
]]>
Ryan Budney comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14503)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14503#Comment_145032011-05-15T13:29:17-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00Ryan Budneyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/107/
Have you tried contacting AIM first? IMO that'd be the most natural first step. If they don't have the information perhaps it would be appropriate to reconstruct it another way and MO would be a ...
Peter McNamara comments on "What happend to the equivariant cohomology wiki?" (14502)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1047/what-happend-to-the-equivariant-cohomology-wiki/?Focus=14502#Comment_145022011-05-15T13:10:51-07:002018-11-04T23:13:20-08:00Peter McNamarahttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/40/
Is a question along the following lines acceptable?At one point in time there was a wiki on equivariant cohomology at http://www.aimath.org/wiki/localization/index.php/Main_Page associated to an AIM ...
At one point in time there was a wiki on equivariant cohomology at http://www.aimath.org/wiki/localization/index.php/Main_Page associated to an AIM conference. Does anyone have a copy of the information that wiki contained? (I can't find it on the wayback machine either).]]>