tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Once works and twice fails) 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Georges Elencwajg comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14624) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14624#Comment_14624 2011-05-25T10:49:12-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 Georges Elencwajg http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/76/ Thank you all, Andrew, Anton, darij and Qiaochu. And sorry for this late acknowledgment , due to some stupid confusion on my part (I had the false memory that I had not yet asked my question!). darijgrinberg comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14580) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14580#Comment_14580 2011-05-20T09:01:18-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 darijgrinberg http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/478/ Oh, I didn't know about <p>. Thanks Andrew!Everything between backticks comes out monospaced.
Everything between backticks comes out monospaced.]]> Anton Geraschenko comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14570) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14570#Comment_14570 2011-05-19T19:25:49-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @darijgrinberg: what Andrew said. If you put the whole answer between backticks, the non-math part comes out monospaced, right? @darijgrinberg: what Andrew said. If you put the whole answer between backticks, the non-math part comes out monospaced, right?

]]> Andrew Stacey comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14563) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14563#Comment_14563 2011-05-19T11:43:57-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ To get rid of all Markdown formatting, the best strategy is to enclose the paragraph/answer in <p> ... </p> tags. To get rid of all Markdown formatting, the best strategy is to enclose the paragraph/answer in

<p> ... </p>

tags.

]]> Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14559) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14559#Comment_14559 2011-05-19T10:03:46-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 Qiaochu Yuan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/13/ Underscores (and asterisks) are parsed as MarkDown; they're both syntax for italics, and our rendering engine parses MarkDown before LaTeX. Escaping them with backslash, as in _, should fix it (and ... Underscores (and asterisks) are parsed as MarkDown; they're both syntax for italics, and our rendering engine parses MarkDown before LaTeX. Escaping them with backslash, as in _, should fix it (and if not try the backticks).

]]> darijgrinberg comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14557) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14557#Comment_14557 2011-05-19T10:01:54-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 darijgrinberg http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/478/ Because markdown interprets two _ signs as italics. That's the reason I have put some of my answers in backticks completely, as I grew tired of backticking every single formula. Georges Elencwajg comments on "Once works and twice fails" (14556) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1050/once-works-and-twice-fails/?Focus=14556#Comment_14556 2011-05-19T09:48:27-07:00 2018-11-04T13:07:42-08:00 Georges Elencwajg http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/76/ If I type [ $k[x]_{x}$] , it renders as expected.But if I type[ $k[x]_{x}$ is $k[x]_{x}$], the rendering is completely botched.Could somebody please explain what is going on? Sorry if this has ... Could somebody please explain what is going on? Sorry if this has already been mentioned.]]>