tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Adding relevant links to TeX-SX.) 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Andrew Stacey comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14085) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14085#Comment_14085 2011-04-11T06:41:13-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ Given the number of times that I've done that, I'm tempted to suggest to the SE people that they register 'stackexchance' as an alias. Thanks for the check. Given the number of times that I've done that, I'm tempted to suggest to the SE people that they register 'stackexchance' as an alias.

Thanks for the check.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14084) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14084#Comment_14084 2011-04-11T06:34:18-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 geraldedgar http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/116/ with your spelling exchance for exchange, the first link doesn't work... with your spelling exchance for exchange, the first link doesn't work...

]]>
José Figueroa comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14082) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14082#Comment_14082 2011-04-10T18:49:50-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 José Figueroa http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/68/ (N+1st)'d. (N+1st)'d.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14080) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14080#Comment_14080 2011-04-10T14:04:22-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ Thirded! (or fourthed?) Thirded! (or fourthed?)

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14079) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14079#Comment_14079 2011-04-10T13:51:45-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Of course, it's a great idea. There's no reason the closed pages shouldn't be useful. Of course, it's a great idea. There's no reason the closed pages shouldn't be useful.

]]>
Noah Snyder comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14078) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14078#Comment_14078 2011-04-10T13:38:43-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 Noah Snyder http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/59/ Sounds like a good idea to me. Andrew Stacey comments on "Adding relevant links to TeX-SX." (14077) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1008/adding-relevant-links-to-texsx/?Focus=14077#Comment_14077 2011-04-10T13:14:17-07:00 2018-11-04T23:16:34-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ This feels as though it should be okay, but I thought I'd mention it here in case there were any objections that I hadn't thought of. The question ... This feels as though it should be okay, but I thought I'd mention it here in case there were any objections that I hadn't thought of. The question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/61227/how-to-write-a-multiple-choice-test-book-with-latex was closed with comments saying that it would fit better on http://tex.stackexchange.com. I saw that (presumably) the questioner took that advice and the question was asked there. So I added a link to the question on TeX-SX to the top of the question on MO, so that anyone who sees the question here will know where to go to on TeX-SX.

Is this acceptable behaviour? I'd only do it if the question was reposted, and probably only if it was closed here. If we were part of the SE2.0 network, this would have been migrated and there would have been a trail to follow to take you to the final resting place of the question, so I'm simply trying to do by hand what would have been done automatically.

]]>