tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Am I too uncharitable regarding this answer?) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:00:23 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher quid comments on "Am I too uncharitable regarding this answer?" (21514) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21514#Comment_21514 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21514#Comment_21514 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:08:23 -0800 quid @Todd Trimble: thank you for the quick feedback! (Meanwhile, it is up to four flags.) [Added later it is deleted now.]

]]> Todd Trimble comments on "Am I too uncharitable regarding this answer?" (21513) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21513#Comment_21513 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21513#Comment_21513 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:34:20 -0800 Todd Trimble Nah; you're fine quid. It looks spammy to me too.

]]> quid comments on "Am I too uncharitable regarding this answer?" (21511) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21511#Comment_21511 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1547/am-i-too-uncharitable-regarding-this-answer/?Focus=21511#Comment_21511 Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:24:59 -0800 quid Some hours ago I found a new answer in the Experimental Mathematics question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/12085/experimental-mathematics/123321#123321 [added: meanwhile also gone] to which I reacted quite harshly, downvote and flagged as spam. The reason for the latter is that this very same vixra-preprint got already mentioned I think at least three times on the site; an occassion I definitely could track down from just 10 days ago http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110944/what-does-the-numerically-verified-part-of-the-riemann-hypothesis-tell-about-prim/122295#122295 [deleted so not generally visible] then posted from a different (anonymous) acount with not much activity but trying to stir up in a in my opinion strange way some discussion around this same subject some 20 days earlier http://mathoverflow.net/questions/120017/why-mathematicians-do-not-accept-the-wu-sprung-semiclassical-model-as-a-solution [again deleted].

The current posting is from a completely new account, which I however suspect to be not independent, without much evidence beyond doubting two independent mentions of that vixra-preprint.

Yet so far I stayed somewhat alone in my harshness; which suggests it is perceived as overly harsh or the thing was just not yet generally seen. In either case, I thought asking here was a good idea.

]]>