tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Why my question was closed?) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:22:37 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher Anixx comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12554) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12554#Comment_12554 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12554#Comment_12554 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:35:09 -0800 Anixx Mariano comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12545) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12545#Comment_12545 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12545#Comment_12545 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:52:56 -0800 Mariano Yes. That tone is surely going to help.

]]>
Anixx comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12544) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12544#Comment_12544 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12544#Comment_12544 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:58:24 -0800 Anixx
Please tell me where do you see here "not a real question"?

> then you have to specify which axioms of set theory you want to use

OK. I would prefere to see in the answrer that this depends on the axioms chosen, not here.

> Not to mention that if you want to allow non-differentiable functions you can't use derivative as a linear map, so the question wasn't even internally consistent.

I was asking if there exist such operator on any functions that does not belong to the listed. I see no logic problems here. Do you? Is it required for a function to be differentiable for a non-derivative operator on it to exist? Do you have problems with elementary logic? ]]>
Ben Webster comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12543) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12543#Comment_12543 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12543#Comment_12543 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:22:12 -0800 Ben Webster As for why it was closed, you left out so many details that it was completely unanswerable. You hadn't specified a space of functions to use when the question was closed and if you really mean "any function of complex variable" then you have to specify which axioms of set theory you want to use (I have no idea what " I would like to see a counterexample which is impossible with axiom of choice" is supposed to mean. That you don't want counterexamples which require the axiom of choice?). Not to mention that if you want to allow non-differentiable functions you can't use derivative as a linear map, so the question wasn't even internally consistent.

]]>
Ben Webster comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12542) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12542#Comment_12542 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12542#Comment_12542 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:14:28 -0800 Ben Webster Anixx- The reasons for closing were not chosen by us, so for many questions there's no very good choice. If you prefer, I can go back and switch the reason to "not a real question" or "off-topic."

]]>
Anixx comments on "Why my question was closed?" (12541) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12541#Comment_12541 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/893/why-my-question-was-closed/?Focus=12541#Comment_12541 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:45:01 -0800 Anixx
I really fail to see how this general question about operator classes may be "too localized". ]]>