tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Closed question in real analysis) 2018-11-04T13:02:21-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher Will Jagy comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20802) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20802#Comment_20802 2012-12-12T19:46:45-08:00 2018-11-04T13:02:21-08:00 Will Jagy http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/ Looking at his web page, he uses we sometimes, as though everything is a preprint. And he has about 110 papers and preprints. So I think this is the manuscript we. I'm not sure, I couldn't pair a ... Scott Carnahan comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20801) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20801#Comment_20801 2012-12-12T17:49:03-08:00 2018-11-04T13:02:21-08:00 Scott Carnahan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/73/ I'm not sure if this is just a language problem (although I did have to look up "infra dig"). The first version had a "Prove that" command in place of what is now a question. ... I'm not sure if this is just a language problem (although I did have to look up "infra dig").

The first version had a "Prove that" command in place of what is now a question. Also, the "We can provide details to the interested reader" part seems rather strange coming from an individual.

]]> Yemon Choi comments on "Closed question in real analysis" (20800) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1485/closed-question-in-real-analysis/?Focus=20800#Comment_20800 2012-12-12T17:19:25-08:00 2018-11-04T13:02:21-08:00 Yemon Choi http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/81/ This question doesn't seem obviously off-topic or "infra dig" to me... This question doesn't seem obviously off-topic or "infra dig" to me...

]]>