tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here.) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:54:31 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher edenharder comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22774) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22774#Comment_22774 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22774#Comment_22774 Thu, 20 Feb 2014 23:52:19 -0800 edenharder $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ will produce something like $x muandy \mu$ with my mathjax, but the Mathjax used by Math.SE can copy with $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ properly. The setting for my mathjax is as following:

<script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Config({"HTML-CSS": { preferredFont: "TeX", availableFonts: ["STIX","TeX"], linebreaks: { automatic:true }, EqnChunk: (MathJax.Hub.Browser.isMobile ? 10 : 50) }, tex2jax: { inlineMath: [ ["$", "$"], ["\(","\)"] ], processEscapes: true, ignoreClass: "tex2jax_ignore|dno",skipTags: ['script', 'noscript', 'style', 'textarea', 'pre', 'code']}, TeX: { noUndefined: { attributes: { mathcolor: "red", mathbackground: "#FFEEEE", mathsize: "90%" } }, Macros: { href: "{}" } }, messageStyle: "none" }); </script> <script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Queue(function() { var all = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(), i; for(i=0; i < all.length; i += 1) { all[i].SourceElement().parentNode.className += ' has-jax'; } });

What should I do in my own setting? Many thanks!

]]>
Tom Leinster comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22052) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22052#Comment_22052 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22052#Comment_22052 Thu, 09 May 2013 07:03:01 -0700 Tom Leinster Same for me as Angelo, Michael G and Emil J, on two different computers, using Firefox 17 and 20 on two different Linux distributions.

]]>
Emil J comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22049) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22049#Comment_22049 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22049#Comment_22049 Thu, 09 May 2013 05:16:22 -0700 Emil J Michael Greinecker comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22048) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22048#Comment_22048 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22048#Comment_22048 Thu, 09 May 2013 05:10:58 -0700 Michael Greinecker http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48526/how-additive-is-lebesgue-measure-in-zfad/48530#48530

There is no problem with rendering at http://math.stackexchange.com/ , where the new MathJax version is used too. ]]>
Angelo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22041) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22041#Comment_22041 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22041#Comment_22041 Thu, 09 May 2013 00:31:09 -0700 Angelo joro comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22039) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22039#Comment_22039 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22039#Comment_22039 Thu, 09 May 2013 00:15:31 -0700 joro Latex rendering doesn't work for me too. Maybe since yesterday. Clearing cache and restarting the browser doesn't help. "(Re)process math with jsMath." helps.

"(Re)process math with jsMath." is not consistent - sometimes the latex is smaller without context menu, sometimes it is the usual way with context menu.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22038) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22038#Comment_22038 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22038#Comment_22038 Wed, 08 May 2013 18:43:37 -0700 Andres Caicedo i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22037) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22037#Comment_22037 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22037#Comment_22037 Wed, 08 May 2013 18:29:22 -0700 i707107 i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22036) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22036#Comment_22036 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22036#Comment_22036 Wed, 08 May 2013 18:25:51 -0700 i707107 Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22033) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22033#Comment_22033 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22033#Comment_22033 Wed, 08 May 2013 16:56:26 -0700 Scott Morrison @Andres, could you point to an example page where you're seeing this issue?

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22032) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22032#Comment_22032 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22032#Comment_22032 Wed, 08 May 2013 16:55:09 -0700 Scott Morrison @i707107,

we've just upgraded MathJax to 2.2-beta. Briefly, it was setup incorrectly, causing your issue. It should be resolved now (and is for me). If you're still seeing the problem, try the usual tricks for clearing your cache (restart your browser, clear the cache for mathoverflow.net), and if the problem is still there let us know.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22031) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22031#Comment_22031 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22031#Comment_22031 Wed, 08 May 2013 16:06:35 -0700 Andres Caicedo i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22030) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22030#Comment_22030 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22030#Comment_22030 Wed, 08 May 2013 15:30:58 -0700 i707107 But formulas between two dollar signs work fine. ]]> Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21972) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21972#Comment_21972 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21972#Comment_21972 Wed, 01 May 2013 23:09:20 -0700 Scott Morrison Looks like my hosting is having a bad afternoon, so both meta and mathjax on the main site may be a bit flaky.

If it continues, I'll work out how to move the mathjax files somewhere more reliable.

]]>
WillieWong comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21258) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21258#Comment_21258 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21258#Comment_21258 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:59:55 -0800 WillieWong @Jim White: it could be an IE9 problem. On IceWeasel / Firefox on Debian, http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51345/moving-one-family-of-commuting-self-adjoint-operators-to-another-without-losing-c works with no problems when uncollapsing comments.

]]>
Aaron Meyerowitz comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21250) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21250#Comment_21250 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21250#Comment_21250 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:12:58 -0800 Aaron Meyerowitz When I type a $$displayed equation$$ it tends to show up pretty far right of center in the preview. Is this a browser issue? (Chrome). I usually just leave some space and use single dollar signs.

]]>
Jim White comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21221) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21221#Comment_21221 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21221#Comment_21221 Sat, 12 Jan 2013 05:17:58 -0800 Jim White
When I do that, mathjax rendering is not done, even in the first 5 comments, which revert to their unrendered form.

I'm using IE9 as the browser, if that makes any difference. ]]>
Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20535) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20535#Comment_20535 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20535#Comment_20535 Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:59:13 -0800 Harald Hanche-Olsen Does adding braces, like \tilde{\mathfrak{t}}, help? It seems that way, but I only tested it in an editor preview over on faketestsite.

]]>
Nithilher comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20526) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20526#Comment_20526 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20526#Comment_20526 Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:26:29 -0800 Nithilher The following input (within proper LaTeX equation delimiters) yields in a blank white space

\textrm{m}\left(\frac12,\ldots,-i\right) = \int\int\int
\lim_{\tilde\mathfrak{t}\rightarrow\emptyset}
\tilde{\cal E}({{\cal K}'}^4,\bar d\!\infty)\ \ dA_W\,.

If I omit the \mathfrak, everything is fine. At other occurences, \mathfrak renders fine. ]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20202) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20202#Comment_20202 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20202#Comment_20202 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:41:40 -0700 Spice the Bird François G. Dorais comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20201) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20201#Comment_20201 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20201#Comment_20201 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:47:10 -0700 François G. Dorais Always put a space after "<" (or use "\lt" instead) since "<whatever" might be interpreted as the start of an xml tag.

]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20200) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20200#Comment_20200 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20200#Comment_20200 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:28:24 -0700 Spice the Bird Will Jagy comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20199) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20199#Comment_20199 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20199#Comment_20199 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:21:10 -0700 Will Jagy
"We will now put an equivalence relation on the set of leaves. Let L1,L2 be two leaves. Then they are equivalent if sup(L1,L2) has the property that $sup(L_1,L_2)"

while your underlying edit window shows

"We will now put an equivalence relation on the set of leaves. Let $L_1, L_2$ be two leaves. Then they are equivalent if $sup(L_1,L_2)$ has the property that $sup(L_1,L_2)<V\leq L_i$ implies that $V=L_i$. This equivalence relation will partician the set of leaves as follows: $ P_1,P_2,\ldots P_k$
Note that the group, $AUT(P_1)\times\ldots AUT(P_k)$ will provide a natural isomorphism between the functor $F_T$ and itself. $if $\sigma\in AUT(P_1)\times\ldots AUT(P_k)$, then $\sigma$ give rise to an endofunctor, $cell^n\rightarrow cell^n$,by permuting the appropriate factors. We will abuse the notation and denote this functor by $\sigma$."

Perhaps moderators can see more, but from my viewpoint there is some kind of problem. To minimize frustration, I suggest you copy your whole edit window contents into a Latex document at home, work on it there until it is all ready. Then open up the edit window for your answer again, delete the stuff there now, paste in the good Latex code, save, preview, finally undelete. As an alternative you can just make a third answer.

I use this method, as a result i have never tried to learn MathJax. Just a handful of quick fixes from Latex to MathJax or whatever. I keep a big file I call MathOverthrow.tex. Each time I want to compose something I put in a \newpage command, then tack on new material until it comes out right. At this point, it is about 89 pages, mostly because I keep interrupting things to start a new page. ]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20198) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20198#Comment_20198 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20198#Comment_20198 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:20:26 -0700 Spice the Bird It is the longer of the two answers. After the problem is figured figured out, I need to make some edits (clean the answer). ]]> Will Jagy comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20197) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20197#Comment_20197 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20197#Comment_20197 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:49:14 -0700 Will Jagy Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20196) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20196#Comment_20196 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20196#Comment_20196 Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:35:06 -0700 Spice the Bird Should I undelete the answer, so that one may have a look at it, post a link? ]]> Lennart Stern comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19118) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19118#Comment_19118 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19118#Comment_19118 Tue, 22 May 2012 18:28:30 -0700 Lennart Stern Zev Chonoles comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19089) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19089#Comment_19089 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19089#Comment_19089 Fri, 18 May 2012 15:40:36 -0700 Zev Chonoles @Lennart: Try

We consider the set

`$$ S = \left\lbrace (F,h)\;\;\middle\vert\;\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{F\text{ is a decreasing function from }R^{+}\text{ to }R^{+}, h\in R}{0=1- \dfrac{\theta + 1}{\theta} \dfrac {\int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy}{F(0)} \dfrac{F(0)-\frac{1}{2}F(h)}{F(0)-F(h)}} \right\rbrace $$`

The function $L$ is defined on $S$ by 

`$$L(F,h) = \dfrac{\int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=x} F(y) dy dx}{\int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy dx} h$$`
]]>
Lennart Stern comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19069) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19069#Comment_19069 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19069#Comment_19069 Thu, 17 May 2012 06:28:25 -0700 Lennart Stern We consider the set

'$$ S = \lbrace (F,h):F is a decreasing function from R^{+} to R^{+}, h\in R, 0=1- \frac{\theta + 1}{\theta} \frac {\int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy}{F(0)} \frac{F(0)-\frac{1}{2}F(h)}{F(0)-F(h)} \rbrace $$'

The function L is defined on S by

'$$ L(F,h) = \frac{ \int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=x} F(y) dy dx} { \int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy dx} h $$' ]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18812) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18812#Comment_18812 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18812#Comment_18812 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:39:04 -0700 Charles Rezk The machine at work is firefox 3.5.3 on linux; on there everything displays fine (which is good since I can't update this machine).

]]>
WillieWong comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18806) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18806#Comment_18806 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18806#Comment_18806 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:17:42 -0700 WillieWong @Charles: I don't know if you are the only one, but I am not seeing the problem. FWIW I am running Firefox 8 on linux. Is it possible for you to update to a slightly newer version of firefox at all?

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18794) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18794#Comment_18794 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18794#Comment_18794 Sun, 25 Mar 2012 07:42:47 -0700 Charles Rezk Am I the only person seeing this?

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18788) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18788#Comment_18788 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18788#Comment_18788 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:17:29 -0700 Charles Rezk The spacing in math rendering looks terrible for me right now. I'm using firefox 3.6.17 on linux. It appears as though negative space is being inserted after every bit of math, so that the math runs over the text which immediately follows (Added: the amount of negative space is roughly proportional to the number of symbols in the math). Just about any question is showing this: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92061/square-of-a-continuous-map is one where it is obvious.

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18543) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18543#Comment_18543 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18543#Comment_18543 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:16:18 -0800 scaaahu Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18538) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18538#Comment_18538 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18538#Comment_18538 Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:10:08 -0800 Scott Morrison Well, within limits. I'm pretty happy, unfortunately for some, to not aspire to IE "compatibility". On the other hand, this looks very likely to actually be some interaction between IE, MathJax (and possibly the way we load fonts for MathJax?), and as such the MathJax folks are likely to be interested. Can you print from any one sites that use MathJax?

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18513) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18513#Comment_18513 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18513#Comment_18513 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:39:24 -0800 scaaahu Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18512) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18512#Comment_18512 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18512#Comment_18512 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:21:00 -0800 Anton Geraschenko @scaaahu: I don't have a solution, but perhaps you can indicate if I've reproduced your problem. The computers in the Caltech math department run windows with IE 8. When I try to print to pdf, I get the following error from distiller:

%%[ ProductName: Distiller ]%%
MathJax_Math-Italic not found, using Courier.
MathJax_Main-Regular not found, using Courier.
MathJax_Main-Bold not found, using Courier.
%%[ Error: invalidfont; OffendingCommand: show ]%%

Stack:
()


%%[ Flushing: rest of job (to end-of-file) will be ignored ]%%
%%[ Warning: PostScript error. No PDF file produced. ] %%

Print preview (and printing on an actual printer) both work, with the following horrible result:

awful printing

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18507) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18507#Comment_18507 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18507#Comment_18507 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:15:56 -0800 Scott Morrison @scaahu. Unfortunately I can't help identify the error, I don't have access to any windows computers. Does anyone else here have access to IE9? Also, it's perfectly possible to install a second browser in windows, without changing anyone else's experience. (E.g. install Google Chrome, easy to use and relatively excellent security, and as long as you don't set it as the default browser other users of the computer needn't even notice.)

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18495) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18495#Comment_18495 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18495#Comment_18495 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:39:13 -0800 scaaahu
"Have trouble" means the errors are not consistent. The first part the print out of the second answer looked ok. Then I started to see gabbage stuff in the last part of the second answer.

As far as I know, IE9 is the newest IE on Windows. By "better browser" did you mean Firefox?

I am a retiree sharing the computer with my wife. There is no way I can take the computer away from her and install another browser. I might try the printing in the local library. They have Windows XP and IE8. ]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18489) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18489#Comment_18489 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18489#Comment_18489 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:40:04 -0800 Scott Morrison @scaaahu, perhaps you could post the printed version somewhere, so we can have a look? It's a bit hard to guess what's happening if you just say that you "Have trouble". I'm guessing that MathJax hasn't been carefully tested in IE9's print preview mode. Perhaps you might try a better browser? :-)

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18476) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18476#Comment_18476 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18476#Comment_18476 Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:06:30 -0800 scaaahu I don't know where to report this issue. If this is wrong place, please direct me to the right one.

I am using Windows Vista and IE9. I was trying to print http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88368/can-a-group-be-a-universal-turing-machine.

The math symbols like SL_3(Z) disappeared from the Question part.

The math symbols in the first answer look ok. Have trouble with printing the second answer.

Using Print Preview showed the same result. I'd like to know if it's my OS/browser/printer problem, or something I won't be able to fix on my end. Thanks.

]]>
David White comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18451) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18451#Comment_18451 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18451#Comment_18451 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:37:11 -0800 David White http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88362/permutation-of-projective-limits-with-inductive-limits

Any ideas on what could cause this?

EDIT: Using backticks fixed the problem. Thanks to those who posted early in this thread about that particular life-saving measure. ]]>
MTS comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18257) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18257#Comment_18257 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18257#Comment_18257 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:06:26 -0800 MTS MathJax appears not to be rendering at all for me now. It works fine for example on MathSciNet, but not on MO. I am using Firefox 9 on Ubuntu. Any thoughts?

Edit: I figured out what the problem was. I was connecting to the internet through a proxy server (the UC Berkeley library proxy, if it matters) and that was making MO not work. It seems that the problem was specific to StackExchange-type sites. I discovered it when I tried to find something on the AskUbuntu StackExchange site - there was a bar at the top saying that the page was trying to load JavaScript from another domain and that the browser was blocking it. Anyway, turning off the proxy worked - now I use the FireFox plugin FoxyProxy which allows you to switch proxies based on url patterns, so I don't have to manually change it all the time.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16820) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16820#Comment_16820 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16820#Comment_16820 Wed, 02 Nov 2011 02:33:19 -0700 Andrew Stacey

Apologize in advance if I'm posting in the wrong place

Yes you are. General MathJaX bugs should be reported on the MathJaX support site. This is for MathJaX rendering on MathOverflow, and only on MathOverflow.

]]>
Scott Stornetta comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16799) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16799#Comment_16799 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16799#Comment_16799 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:24:38 -0700 Scott Stornetta Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16791) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16791#Comment_16791 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16791#Comment_16791 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:54:11 -0700 Bill Johnson Oh, I see. I deleted the / a couple of hours after my original post. You went to the original source instead of there.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16790) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16790#Comment_16790 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16790#Comment_16790 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:35:18 -0700 Andrew Stacey If you look at the source of your original post, it reads:

For the basic result, start with

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson–Lindenstrauss_lemma/">Wikipedia</a>

or Google "Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma".

In the URL, there is a /. Since I cut-and-pasted from that to do all my experiments, a lot of them had a trailing slash. Sometimes that doesn't matter, sometimes it does. I will freely admit that I should have spotted that and removed it before doing further analysis. Ultimately, the en-dash was the real reason why it didn't work, the trailing slash was what meant that I didn't spot that putting in an ordinary hyphen did work.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16789) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16789#Comment_16789 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16789#Comment_16789 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:26:35 -0700 Bill Johnson Thanks, Andrew. I do not understand your comment about / at the end as I did not put one in...

]]>
Emil J comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16785) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16785#Comment_16785 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16785#Comment_16785 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:02:39 -0700 Emil J Yes, IME, the browser (Firefox) escapes all cut-and-paste URLs automatically so that it all works out, but I suspect that some other browsers may get it wrong. As for replacing en-dashes with hyphens, this only works on Wikipedia because they have a general policy asking article authors (or renamers) to provide redirects in such cases, it is not guaranteed to work in general on other sites.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16784) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16784#Comment_16784 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16784#Comment_16784 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:22:32 -0700 Andrew Stacey

I would have thought that Wikipedia would automatically make redirects to "sanitised" versions of pages, but I can't find one for that page itself

Turns out that it does. There was another problem with the URL that you put in: the / at the end. The correct URL doesn't have that. Somehow in my experimenting with replacing the dash then I overlooked the slash and got false negatives.

Incidentally, when I cut-and-paste the URL using my browser from the page in question, then it gets correctly escaped. That is, when cut-and-pasting here I get:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Lindenstrauss_lemma

Replacing the en-dash by an ordinary hyphen also works:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson-Lindenstrauss_lemma leads to this link. If you click on that, then you'll notice that it goes to the correct page but just below the title is a little "Redirected from ..." message which tells you that the URL that you typed wasn't the real page name, but an alias.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16782) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16782#Comment_16782 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16782#Comment_16782 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:12:47 -0700 Andrew Stacey It isn't the underscore, it's the dash. Whoever created that page on Wikipedia used an ndash to hyphenate the names. Whilst this is technically correct, it makes the link somewhat tricky to type in! You need to be able to type in unicode URLs. StackExchange's Markdown parser only allows certain things in its HTML (see my comment above about sanitising). It would seem that unicode is not allowed. So what Survit did was to replace the unicode character by its "escaped" version - that's the percent stuff.

There's ways to find these escapings, but I don't know of one off-hand. (I would have thought that Wikipedia would automatically make redirects to "sanitised" versions of pages, but I can't find one for that page itself).

Usually, Markdown's own syntax for links is better than using raw HTML, but in this case even that doesn't work. The escaping method is the only one that I can make work correctly. (On the other hand, the Markdown syntax does work correctly here: [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson–Lindenstrauss_lemma) correctly produces Wikipedia).

I just tried on the SE2.0 system and witnessed the same behaviour, so this wouldn't be fixed by migrating!

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16779) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16779#Comment_16779 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16779#Comment_16779 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:53:56 -0700 Bill Johnson It's on

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/79388/minimum-space-dimension-to-place-n-points-knowing-pairwise-distances/79395#79395

Andrew.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16777) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16777#Comment_16777 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16777#Comment_16777 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:42:58 -0700 Andrew Stacey (This isn't a MathJaX isssue, by the way.)

The link (and Scott's <pre> attempt) doesn't work here because the Markdown filter here strips out HTML tags before processing. So any HTML tags get escaped. (Although this stripping is not 100% safe).

On MO, some HTML is allowed, including <a> tags (what is and isn't allowed is governed by a "whitelist" that is listed somewhere on meta.SO). When I cut and paste the code you gave into a blank "Ask a Question" then the preview converts it to a link. So either there's a difference between the preview and what is actually rendered (unlikely in so simple an example) or there's more to your example than just the link. Could you link to the actual post?

More generally, Markdown and HTML are not really meant to mix.

That is about as wrong as it can be! Markdown and HTML are meant to mix. Markdown goes out of its way to be polite to HTML: if it spots any HTML then it says, "I assume that the user knows what they are doing and will just let this go through.". The problem is that many people who've implemented their own version of Markdown have decided that the average user does not know what they are doing and so put in a pre-filter to strip out anything Bad. These pre-filters are complicated because they have to understand both HTML and Markdown. What they should have done is put in a post-filter to check that the final rendering is clean as the post-filter only has to understand HTML.

(Naturally, the nLab and the nForum get it right.)

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16760) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16760#Comment_16760 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16760#Comment_16760 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:16:06 -0700 Bill Johnson I tried backtics--they did not work no matter where I placed them.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16759) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16759#Comment_16759 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16759#Comment_16759 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:01:17 -0700 Scott Morrison Hehe, witness above my failed attempt to use a <pre> tag to prevent Markdown parsing the square brackets. Bumps indeed!

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16758) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16758#Comment_16758 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16758#Comment_16758 Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:00:18 -0700 Scott Morrison Almost certainly it's the underscore. Try backticks surrounding the a tag.

More generally, Markdown and HTML are not really meant to mix. (That is, the <pre>text</pre> syntax is preferred to using <a> tags), but of course it's convenient to do so. This sometimes results in some bumps.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16747) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16747#Comment_16747 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16747#Comment_16747 Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:51:17 -0700 Bill Johnson I used

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Lindenstrauss_lemma">Wikipedia</a>

in a post, but it did not render properly. I see that it also does not render here on Meta at all. Why? Survit edited it to

Wikipedia

which worked fine, but I thought ordinary HTML links worked.

]]>
DavidRoberts comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16155) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16155#Comment_16155 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16155#Comment_16155 Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:02:56 -0700 DavidRoberts I'm running ff3.6 (not my choice - my work won't upgrade), and I'm getting math processing errors all round.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15989) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15989#Comment_15989 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15989#Comment_15989 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:41:12 -0700 Bill Johnson Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15988) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15988#Comment_15988 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15988#Comment_15988 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:25:08 -0700 Andrew Stacey Bill,

That's a text command, not a maths command. MathJaX only supports mathematics commands (well, a subset thereof). If you really want to use proper LaTeX to write MO posts, contact me by email.

In the meantime, lists are done by Markdown syntax:

1. First item
1. Second item
1. Third item

Produces

  1. First item
  2. Second item
  3. Third item
]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15986) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15986#Comment_15986 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15986#Comment_15986 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:48:16 -0700 Bill Johnson Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15758) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15758#Comment_15758 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15758#Comment_15758 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:38:46 -0700 Anton Geraschenko The popup voloch and Charles is confusing, since nothing has changed in our MathJax configuration for a long time.

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15756) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15756#Comment_15756 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15756#Comment_15756 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:07:14 -0700 Charles Rezk I'm getting the same kind of popup voloch mentioned several weeks ago. Whenever I load a mathoverflow page, I get the following popup message:

MathJax no longer loads a default configuration file; you must specify such files explicitly. This page seems to use the older default config/MathJax.js file, and so needs to be updated. This is explained further at

http://www.mathjax.org/help/configuration

Added: Clearing my browser cache seems to fix it.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15687) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15687#Comment_15687 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15687#Comment_15687 Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:36:43 -0700 Anton Geraschenko MathJax doesn't ever read the text in the textarea, but it does read the preview box over and over in order to update the preview. Once it learns the macro, I think it remembers it until you move to a different page.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15682) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15682#Comment_15682 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15682#Comment_15682 Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:53:33 -0700 Andrew Stacey Probably MathJaX read the definition in the textarea which comes before the preview box and so the newcommand was in effect when the preview box was parsed. This relationship was, obviously, changed when you saved your answer.

]]>
David Speyer comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15640) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15640#Comment_15640 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15640#Comment_15640 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:51:05 -0700 David Speyer
Details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110803 Firefox/3.6.20

UPDATE: Nevermind, I just realized that I defined the macro after I used it (fixed now). So the peculiar behavior is that preview let me get away with it, not that the main page didn't. ]]>
voloch comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15337) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15337#Comment_15337 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15337#Comment_15337 Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:01:21 -0700 voloch
I assume this needs to be done server-side. ]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14854) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14854#Comment_14854 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14854#Comment_14854 Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:02:26 -0700 Scott Morrison L Spice comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14853) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14853#Comment_14853 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14853#Comment_14853 Sun, 03 Jul 2011 07:34:12 -0700 L Spice The processor gets confused on the admittedly complicated case where a \text block contains math. For example, I couldn't typeset the legitimate TeX code \Ext^1_{\text{$\mathbb F_p$-alg}}. (It is surely possible, but I think unsatisfactory, to type instead \Ext^1_{\mathbb F_p\text{-alg}}.)

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14571) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14571#Comment_14571 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14571#Comment_14571 Thu, 19 May 2011 19:27:52 -0700 Anton Geraschenko

Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere?

http://mathoverflow.net/faq#latex , where it says "workaround".

]]>
Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14558) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14558#Comment_14558 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14558#Comment_14558 Thu, 19 May 2011 10:02:14 -0700 Qiaochu Yuan If it was the subscripts, that's a known issue that's been discussed on meta before. Subscripts and asterisks are both parsed as MarkDown and occasionally need to be escaped by a backslash to be used properly.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14554) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14554#Comment_14554 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14554#Comment_14554 Thu, 19 May 2011 05:25:10 -0700 geraldedgar Thanks for fixing the display. Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere?

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14537) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14537#Comment_14537 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14537#Comment_14537 Wed, 18 May 2011 07:03:57 -0700 dthurston geraldedgar: I think the double dollar signs confused the parser, or maybe the subscripts. I added backquotes around the displayed math and it fixed the issue.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14536) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14536#Comment_14536 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14536#Comment_14536 Wed, 18 May 2011 05:30:46 -0700 geraldedgar dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14531) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14531#Comment_14531 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14531#Comment_14531 Tue, 17 May 2011 14:05:46 -0700 dthurston I doubt it's a rendering issue, since it also shows up for me in Chromium. This is obviously and typically a conversion issue; this is what you get if you just enter italic text in math mode without protection. See also theojf's answer in the separate thread I started on this, before realising it should be here.

If you want me to report the bug, I need to know details like which version of MathJax you're using and how it's configured.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14500) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14500#Comment_14500 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14500#Comment_14500 Sat, 14 May 2011 20:31:54 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @dthurston: yes, I agree that the second one is ugly, though I wouldn't have called it exceptionally or horrendously ugly. Perhaps somebody here knows if this is an issue with how MathJax converts to MathML or with how Firefox renders MathML. It's probably a good idea to ask on a MathJax forum.

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14497) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14497#Comment_14497 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14497#Comment_14497 Sat, 14 May 2011 19:41:40 -0700 dthurston @Anton: your second snapshot is about what I see, and is horrendously ugly. I'm very surprised you don't see that. Look at the spacing between the 'f's. It's doing the thing TeX does by default, which is to typeset anything in math mode as though it were a product ("D times i times f times f"), which is not all what is intended.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14493) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14493#Comment_14493 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14493#Comment_14493 Sat, 14 May 2011 10:58:05 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @dthurston: could you include a screenshot? It doesn't look particularly ugly to me. I've tried both HTML+CSS and MathML rendering on Firefox 3.6.16 on Ubuntu (Edit: they look like html+css and mathml, respectively, but not as pixilated)

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14490) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14490#Comment_14490 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14490#Comment_14490 Sat, 14 May 2011 06:19:11 -0700 dthurston I asked this as a separate discussion, but probably it belongs here.

The command \mathit seems to be completely ignored in LaTeX input. This yields exceptionally ugly results at times, eg, here. Why does this happen, and can it be fixed?

(\textit likewise does not work right.)

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13855) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13855#Comment_13855 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13855#Comment_13855 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:14:34 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @shogun70: Thanks for all your help! I've moved the .htaccess file to the parent directory. Now otf and eot files appear to have the correct headers.

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13838) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13838#Comment_13838 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13838#Comment_13838 Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:42:24 -0700 shogun70
@Anton: You've found a MathJax documentation error - that location will work (is working) for .otf files (needed for Firefox) but not .eot (needed for IE9). I can't check mathoverflow.net with IE9 until tomorrow, but I assume it is rendering math with image fonts.

The mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/.htaccess file should be moved to an ancestor directory of the one it is currently in, or merged with the .htaccess file in the top directory (mathjax1.1/.htaccess). ]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13811) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13811#Comment_13811 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13811#Comment_13811 Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:21:20 -0700 Anton Geraschenko The htaccess file handling the fonts is in mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/, like the MathJax docs recommend.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13810) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13810#Comment_13810 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13810#Comment_13810 Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:05:19 -0700 Scott Morrison Okay, I think I added the DEFLATE filter. Could someone (@shogun70?) check that it's working?

Actually, I'm a bit confused about our .htaccess files for latex.mathoverflow.net. @Anton, the .htaccess I added a line to didn't have anything about "Access-Control-Allow-Origin", and I couldn't find any others. Where did you do this?

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13797) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13797#Comment_13797 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13797#Comment_13797 Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:49:59 -0700 shogun70 Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13796) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13796#Comment_13796 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13796#Comment_13796 Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:05:55 -0700 Andrew Stacey It's comments like that which make me wish that meta.MO had a soundtrack. There ought to have been some menacing music building to a crescendo at the words "root access" (with possibly some manic laughter off-stage).

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13795) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13795#Comment_13795 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13795#Comment_13795 Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:07:37 -0700 Scott Morrison I'm pretty sure I don't need to do anything further, but for future reference we can control exactly what is controllable via .htaccess files, and nothing more.

On the other hand, if it ever comes to it we have some alternative hosts (sitting under various people's office desks, in Toronto or Berkeley) where I have root access and full control of apache.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13774) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13774#Comment_13774 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13774#Comment_13774 Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:46:34 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @shogun70: Holy moly, you're right! It looks like I screwed up the upgrade to MathJax 1.1 and called the file .htacess instead of .htaccess. It should be corrected now. Thanks for catching this!

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13773) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13773#Comment_13773 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13773#Comment_13773 Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:23:00 -0700 shogun70
Using the following
curl -D headers.txt http://latex.mathoverflow.net/mathjax/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_Main-Regular.otf > /dev/null
I do see the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header.

Using
curl -D headers.txt http://latex.mathoverflow.net/mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_Main-Regular.otf > /dev/null
I do NOT see the header. ]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13771) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13771#Comment_13771 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13771#Comment_13771 Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:33:56 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @shogun70: We already have such an .htaccess file. See this thread.

@Scott M: (not in response to anything he's posted here recently) How much control do you have over Apache? Can you tell it to gzip MathJax as shogun70 suggests?

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13765) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13765#Comment_13765 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13765#Comment_13765 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:11:38 -0700 shogun70
I also noticed that resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net (basically MathJax) don't seem to be gzip'ed.
All files in the MathJax distribution can be reduced with gzip, with the exception of png files (for image fonts).

In Apache, something like the following might be appropriate:
AddOutputFilter DEFLATE html xhtml css xml svg js eot otf ttf ]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13764) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13764#Comment_13764 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13764#Comment_13764 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:11:16 -0700 shogun70
For cross-site use (e.g. resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net) Firefox requires font-files to be delivered with the HTTP header
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

On mathoverflow this header isn't set so the font-files aren't applied and MathJax falls back to font images.
This HTTP header is also required for cross-site font-files in IE9.

For Apache, something like the following in an appropriate .htaccess file would work:
<FilesMatch "\.(otf|eot)$">
<IfModule mod_headers.c>
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
</IfModule>
</FilesMatch>

EDIT:
Actually, I forgot that this is already in the documentation. See the Notes about Shared Installations at http://www.mathjax.org/docs/1.1/installation.html ]]>
Ilya Grigoriev comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13755) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13755#Comment_13755 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13755#Comment_13755 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:47:45 -0700 Ilya Grigoriev
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/32387/computation-of-homology-groups-of-m-g-n ]]>
Kelly Davis comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13735) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13735#Comment_13735 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13735#Comment_13735 Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:18:33 -0700 Kelly Davis Kelly Davis comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13733) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13733#Comment_13733 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13733#Comment_13733 Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:16:39 -0700 Kelly Davis
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/59046/can-you-flip-the-end-of-a-large-exotic-mathbbr4

inclusion of \langle and \rangle latex tags makes rendering on a mac, with the latest chrome, and on an iPad, with the latest safari, place the < and > incorrectly and also sometimes places surrounding text incorrectly also. ]]>
Evan Jenkins comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13661) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13661#Comment_13661 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13661#Comment_13661 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:49:55 -0700 Evan Jenkins @Anton: I tried clearing my cache, but it's still doing it in both versions of Firefox.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13658) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13658#Comment_13658 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13658#Comment_13658 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:29:34 -0700 Anton Geraschenko @Evan: as you can see from the comment thread to that issue, we actually updated to those fonts right away. Today (about twenty minutes ago) we upgraded to MathJax 1.1, which has some improvements in browser support. Try clearing your cache. If the problem persists, please leave a post saying so.

]]>
Evan Jenkins comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13642) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13642#Comment_13642 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13642#Comment_13642 Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:55:31 -0700 Evan Jenkins For some reason, MathJax renders everything as PNG images for me in Firefox (both Firefox 3.6.13 and the Firefox 4 RC) on OS X (10.6.6), while both Chrome and Safari correctly render everything using web fonts. This problem is specific to MO; the demos on the MathJax web site, for instance, work fine in either version of Firefox. Could this be related to this issue?

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13623) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13623#Comment_13623 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13623#Comment_13623 Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:51:06 -0800 Andrew Stacey I thought that MathJaX wasn't enabled for the main page. I seem to be getting quite a few "busy script" error messages these days on the main page.

(Though it might be that the script is still trying to work on the page I was on before navigating to the main page; nonetheless, I feel as though I'm getting more of these than I used to.)

]]>
grp comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13563) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13563#Comment_13563 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13563#Comment_13563 Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:11:13 -0800 grp
Gerhard Paseman, 2011.03.02 ]]>