tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (What happened to the question on Radon-Nikodym for distributions?) 2018-11-04T13:49:24-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher WillieWong comments on "What happened to the question on Radon-Nikodym for distributions?" (16821) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1196/what-happened-to-the-question-on-radonnikodym-for-distributions/?Focus=16821#Comment_16821 2011-11-02T02:51:09-07:00 2018-11-04T13:49:24-08:00 WillieWong http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/288/ @Scott @Andrew: thanks. @Scott @Andrew: thanks.

]]> Andrew Stacey comments on "What happened to the question on Radon-Nikodym for distributions?" (16819) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1196/what-happened-to-the-question-on-radonnikodym-for-distributions/?Focus=16819#Comment_16819 2011-11-02T02:32:09-07:00 2018-11-04T13:49:24-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ It's been deleted by the questioner. From a cursory glance at the question and comments then I can't see a reference to an actual book. It's been deleted by the questioner. From a cursory glance at the question and comments then I can't see a reference to an actual book.

]]> Scott Carnahan comments on "What happened to the question on Radon-Nikodym for distributions?" (16818) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1196/what-happened-to-the-question-on-radonnikodym-for-distributions/?Focus=16818#Comment_16818 2011-11-02T02:30:24-07:00 2018-11-04T13:49:24-08:00 Scott Carnahan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/73/ It appears that a (well-known) user answered, then retracted and deleted the answer. The questioner then deleted the question after a commenter gave a reason why the quest for a positive statement ... It appears that a (well-known) user answered, then retracted and deleted the answer. The questioner then deleted the question after a commenter gave a reason why the quest for a positive statement was likely to be hopeless. No references were given for explicit claims, although there was some talk about what books are good in general.

]]> WillieWong comments on "What happened to the question on Radon-Nikodym for distributions?" (16817) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1196/what-happened-to-the-question-on-radonnikodym-for-distributions/?Focus=16817#Comment_16817 2011-11-02T01:42:59-07:00 2018-11-04T13:49:24-08:00 WillieWong http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/288/ Yesterday there was a question: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/79689/lebesgue-decomposition-and-radon-nikodym-theorem-for-distributions Today it seems to be not there any more. Can a mod or 10K ... Yesterday there was a question:

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/79689/lebesgue-decomposition-and-radon-nikodym-theorem-for-distributions

Today it seems to be not there any more. Can a mod or 10K user tell me roughly what happened? I am not so much interested in the answer as the reference: strangely none of the books I have handy gives the result which I thought I knew to be true.

]]>