Two points:
1) I am inclined to agree that this completely autonomous, nearly prohibitively difficult to track, "suspicious vote detector" algorithm is functionally equivalent to a bug in the system. If it's a feature, it's a feature that nearly all of us on MO disagree with in its current form and would like to see changed. Anton has requested changes in the SVD and his request has received support but as yet no clear administrative response. In my reckoning, we are building up a good-sized queue of features that none of us seem to want. This is something to be fixed in the long term, but it's not going to be easy, so it's best not to get too worked up about these relatively minor issues.
2) Do remember that reputation can be converted to cold, hard cash at the rate of 0 cents per point. In other words, it's not a commodity in any hard-nosed economic sense. Most of the value it has is in the way it playfully, but addictively, encourages us to participate more and better. Earning reputation on MO is supposed to be fun. Losing reputation for no apparent reason is not much fun (it's happened to me too, on a slightly smaller scale); trying to exhaustively track down exactly where it went sounds like even less fun to me. With equal or less effort, one could just as well earn it back. Most people here are relatively generous with our commodity: if you post a few good (as usual) answers to questions, probably some people who have followed this thread will pitch in and toss a little extra reputation in your direction.
]]>One thing to remember is that if you hit the reputation cap one day, but then "suspicious votes" to you were deleted, it won't retroactively give you the points that were beyond the cap.
]]>The suspicious vote pattern detector will only automatically delete votes that are really suspicious. It's hard to analyse because the votes are completely removed from the database. See this feature request of mine, which requests that there be an audit trail to make it easier to figure out what has happened.
]]>"Isn't it ironic that robots are punishing a human for not convincing them that he is human enough?"
struck me as amusing given many Canadians' views on their Prime Minister's right-ish wing leanings...
]]>I don't think this is directly relevant, but yesterday I wasn't able to submit an answer, because the captcha word never loaded, even with multiple reloads (poor internet connection...). Isn't it ironic that robots are punishing a human for not convincing them that he is human enough?
]]>