tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here.) 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher edenharder comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22774) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22774#Comment_22774 2014-02-20T23:52:19-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 edenharder http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/968/ $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ will produce something like $x muandy \mu$ with my mathjax, but the Mathjax used by Math.SE can copy with $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ properly. The setting for my mathjax is as ... $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ will produce something like $x muandy \mu$ with my mathjax, but the Mathjax used by Math.SE can copy with $x_\mu$ and $y_\mu$ properly. The setting for my mathjax is as following:

<script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Config({"HTML-CSS": { preferredFont: "TeX", availableFonts: ["STIX","TeX"], linebreaks: { automatic:true }, EqnChunk: (MathJax.Hub.Browser.isMobile ? 10 : 50) }, tex2jax: { inlineMath: [ ["$", "$"], ["\(","\)"] ], processEscapes: true, ignoreClass: "tex2jax_ignore|dno",skipTags: ['script', 'noscript', 'style', 'textarea', 'pre', 'code']}, TeX: { noUndefined: { attributes: { mathcolor: "red", mathbackground: "#FFEEEE", mathsize: "90%" } }, Macros: { href: "{}" } }, messageStyle: "none" }); </script> <script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Queue(function() { var all = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(), i; for(i=0; i < all.length; i += 1) { all[i].SourceElement().parentNode.className += ' has-jax'; } });

What should I do in my own setting? Many thanks!

]]>
Tom Leinster comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22052) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22052#Comment_22052 2013-05-09T07:03:01-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Tom Leinster http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/106/ Same for me as Angelo, Michael G and Emil J, on two different computers, using Firefox 17 and 20 on two different Linux distributions. Same for me as Angelo, Michael G and Emil J, on two different computers, using Firefox 17 and 20 on two different Linux distributions.

]]>
Emil J comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22049) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22049#Comment_22049 2013-05-09T05:16:22-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Emil J http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/514/ Rendering is also awfully slow for me. More precisely, after loading the page, it takes about15–20 seconds before anything starts to happen with the MathJax snippets. Then the equations start to ... Michael Greinecker comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22048) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22048#Comment_22048 2013-05-09T05:10:58-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Michael Greinecker http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/668/ MathJax works but is ridiculuously slow. Rendering the following took ten seconds: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48526/how-additive-is-lebesgue-measure-in-zfad/48530#48530There is no problem with ... http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48526/how-additive-is-lebesgue-measure-in-zfad/48530#48530

There is no problem with rendering at http://math.stackexchange.com/ , where the new MathJax version is used too.]]>
Angelo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22041) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22041#Comment_22041 2013-05-09T00:31:09-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Angelo http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/483/ LaTeX rendering works for me, but it has become a lot slower than it used to be. I use Firefox 20.0 on a Macbook, OS X 10.8.3. I delete the cache and restarted the browser, to no avail. I see the ... joro comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22039) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22039#Comment_22039 2013-05-09T00:15:31-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 joro http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/602/ Latex rendering doesn't work for me too. Maybe since yesterday. Clearing cache and restarting the browser doesn't help. "(Re)process math with jsMath." helps. "(Re)process math with ... Latex rendering doesn't work for me too. Maybe since yesterday. Clearing cache and restarting the browser doesn't help. "(Re)process math with jsMath." helps.

"(Re)process math with jsMath." is not consistent - sometimes the latex is smaller without context menu, sometimes it is the usual way with context menu.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22038) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22038#Comment_22038 2013-05-08T18:43:37-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andres Caicedo http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/251/ Scott: One was http://mathoverflow.net/questions/129036/counterintuitive-consequences-of-the-axiom-of-determinacy/129040#129040 another was ... i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22037) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22037#Comment_22037 2013-05-08T18:29:22-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 i707107 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/936/ @Scott Morrison, actually the problem resolved for me. but the formulas show up a lot slower than before. i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22036) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22036#Comment_22036 2013-05-08T18:25:51-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 i707107 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/936/ @Scott Morrison, after I deleted all cache, I am still seeing the same problem. Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22033) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22033#Comment_22033 2013-05-08T16:56:26-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ @Andres, could you point to an example page where you're seeing this issue? @Andres, could you point to an example page where you're seeing this issue?

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22032) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22032#Comment_22032 2013-05-08T16:55:09-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ @i707107, we've just upgraded MathJax to 2.2-beta. Briefly, it was setup incorrectly, causing your issue. It should be resolved now (and is for me). If you're still seeing the problem, try the usual ... @i707107,

we've just upgraded MathJax to 2.2-beta. Briefly, it was setup incorrectly, causing your issue. It should be resolved now (and is for me). If you're still seeing the problem, try the usual tricks for clearing your cache (restart your browser, clear the cache for mathoverflow.net), and if the problem is still there let us know.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22031) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22031#Comment_22031 2013-05-08T16:06:35-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andres Caicedo http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/251/ Can anyone explain why something like $\mathsf{AD}_{\mathbb R}$ works sometimes and other times it doesn't? (When it doesn't, the text after {AD} appears emphasized.) i707107 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (22030) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=22030#Comment_22030 2013-05-08T15:30:58-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 i707107 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/936/ Suddenly from last night, the LaTex code for formulas inside sentence (formula between single dollar signs) do not work. But formulas between two dollar signs work fine. But formulas between two dollar signs work fine.]]> Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21972) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21972#Comment_21972 2013-05-01T23:09:20-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Looks like my hosting is having a bad afternoon, so both meta and mathjax on the main site may be a bit flaky. If it continues, I'll work out how to move the mathjax files somewhere more reliable. Looks like my hosting is having a bad afternoon, so both meta and mathjax on the main site may be a bit flaky.

If it continues, I'll work out how to move the mathjax files somewhere more reliable.

]]>
WillieWong comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21258) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21258#Comment_21258 2013-01-25T03:59:55-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 WillieWong http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/288/ @Jim White: it could be an IE9 problem. On IceWeasel / Firefox on Debian, http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51345/moving-one-family-of-commuting-self-adjoint-operators-to-another-without-losing-c ... @Jim White: it could be an IE9 problem. On IceWeasel / Firefox on Debian, http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51345/moving-one-family-of-commuting-self-adjoint-operators-to-another-without-losing-c works with no problems when uncollapsing comments.

]]>
Aaron Meyerowitz comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21250) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21250#Comment_21250 2013-01-22T12:12:58-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Aaron Meyerowitz http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/436/ When I type a $$displayed equation$$ it tends to show up pretty far right of center in the preview. Is this a browser issue? (Chrome). I usually just leave some space and use single dollar signs. When I type a $$displayed equation$$ it tends to show up pretty far right of center in the preview. Is this a browser issue? (Chrome). I usually just leave some space and use single dollar signs.

]]>
Jim White comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (21221) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=21221#Comment_21221 2013-01-12T05:17:58-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Jim White http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/874/ If an answer on mathoverflow has more than 5 comments, you have to click on &quot;add/show more comments&quot;.When I do that, mathjax rendering is not done, even in the first 5 comments, ...
When I do that, mathjax rendering is not done, even in the first 5 comments, which revert to their unrendered form.

I'm using IE9 as the browser, if that makes any difference.]]>
Harald Hanche-Olsen comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20535) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20535#Comment_20535 2012-11-15T13:59:13-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Harald Hanche-Olsen http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/18/ Does adding braces, like \tilde{\mathfrak{t}}, help? It seems that way, but I only tested it in an editor preview over on faketestsite. Does adding braces, like \tilde{\mathfrak{t}}, help? It seems that way, but I only tested it in an editor preview over on faketestsite.

]]>
Nithilher comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20526) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20526#Comment_20526 2012-11-12T01:26:29-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Nithilher http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/831/ Problem with \mathfrakThe following input (within proper LaTeX equation delimiters) yields in a blank white space\textrm{m}\left(\frac12,\ldots,-i\right) = ... The following input (within proper LaTeX equation delimiters) yields in a blank white space

\textrm{m}\left(\frac12,\ldots,-i\right) = \int\int\int
\lim_{\tilde\mathfrak{t}\rightarrow\emptyset}
\tilde{\cal E}({{\cal K}'}^4,\bar d\!\infty)\ \ dA_W\,.

If I omit the \mathfrak, everything is fine. At other occurences, \mathfrak renders fine.]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20202) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20202#Comment_20202 2012-09-23T23:41:40-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Spice the Bird http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/664/ That did the trick François. Thank you. François G. Dorais comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20201) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20201#Comment_20201 2012-09-23T21:47:10-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 François G. Dorais http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/144/ Always put a space after "&lt;" (or use "\lt" instead) since "&lt;whatever" might be interpreted as the start of an xml tag. Always put a space after "<" (or use "\lt" instead) since "<whatever" might be interpreted as the start of an xml tag.

]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20200) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20200#Comment_20200 2012-09-23T16:28:24-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Spice the Bird http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/664/ Thank you Will. I have my work saved in an email. I will take your advice. Will Jagy comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20199) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20199#Comment_20199 2012-09-23T16:21:10-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Will Jagy http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/ Spice, the longer visible (though deleted) answer dies out at: &quot;We will now put an equivalence relation on the set of leaves. Let L1,L2 be two leaves. Then they are equivalent if sup(L1,L2) ...
"We will now put an equivalence relation on the set of leaves. Let L1,L2 be two leaves. Then they are equivalent if sup(L1,L2) has the property that $sup(L_1,L_2)"

while your underlying edit window shows

"We will now put an equivalence relation on the set of leaves. Let $L_1, L_2$ be two leaves. Then they are equivalent if $sup(L_1,L_2)$ has the property that $sup(L_1,L_2)<V\leq L_i$ implies that $V=L_i$. This equivalence relation will partician the set of leaves as follows: $ P_1,P_2,\ldots P_k$
Note that the group, $AUT(P_1)\times\ldots AUT(P_k)$ will provide a natural isomorphism between the functor $F_T$ and itself. $if $\sigma\in AUT(P_1)\times\ldots AUT(P_k)$, then $\sigma$ give rise to an endofunctor, $cell^n\rightarrow cell^n$,by permuting the appropriate factors. We will abuse the notation and denote this functor by $\sigma$."

Perhaps moderators can see more, but from my viewpoint there is some kind of problem. To minimize frustration, I suggest you copy your whole edit window contents into a Latex document at home, work on it there until it is all ready. Then open up the edit window for your answer again, delete the stuff there now, paste in the good Latex code, save, preview, finally undelete. As an alternative you can just make a third answer.

I use this method, as a result i have never tried to learn MathJax. Just a handful of quick fixes from Latex to MathJax or whatever. I keep a big file I call MathOverthrow.tex. Each time I want to compose something I put in a \newpage command, then tack on new material until it comes out right. At this point, it is about 89 pages, mostly because I keep interrupting things to start a new page.]]>
Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20198) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20198#Comment_20198 2012-09-23T15:20:26-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Spice the Bird http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/664/ Thank you Will. The question is one of mine that I finnaly found an answer. The link is ... It is the longer of the two answers. After the problem is figured figured out, I need to make some edits (clean the answer).]]> Will Jagy comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20197) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20197#Comment_20197 2012-09-23T14:49:14-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Will Jagy http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/208/ Spice, i am willing to look at it, just post the question number here, any 10K user will be able to see. i can say that I have often had trouble composing on site. My habit is to compose anything ... Spice the Bird comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (20196) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=20196#Comment_20196 2012-09-23T14:35:06-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Spice the Bird http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/664/ I recently attempted to give an answer to a question. The answer is rather long, so after a certain amount of typing my answer no longer was shown in the preview. Then I posted the incomplete answer ... Should I undelete the answer, so that one may have a look at it, post a link?]]> Lennart Stern comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19118) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19118#Comment_19118 2012-05-22T18:28:30-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Lennart Stern http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/750/ Thanks! Now it is working. Zev Chonoles comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19089) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19089#Comment_19089 2012-05-18T15:40:36-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Zev Chonoles http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/123/ @Lennart: Try We consider the set `$$ S = \left\lbrace (F,h)\;\;\middle\vert\;\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{F\text{ is a decreasing function from }R^{+}\text{ to }R^{+}, h\in R}{0=1- \dfrac{\theta + ... @Lennart: Try

We consider the set

`$$ S = \left\lbrace (F,h)\;\;\middle\vert\;\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{F\text{ is a decreasing function from }R^{+}\text{ to }R^{+}, h\in R}{0=1- \dfrac{\theta + 1}{\theta} \dfrac {\int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy}{F(0)} \dfrac{F(0)-\frac{1}{2}F(h)}{F(0)-F(h)}} \right\rbrace $$`

The function $L$ is defined on $S$ by 

`$$L(F,h) = \dfrac{\int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=x} F(y) dy dx}{\int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy dx} h$$`
]]>
Lennart Stern comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (19069) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=19069#Comment_19069 2012-05-17T06:28:25-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Lennart Stern http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/750/ Hello, I am unable to make this appear properly:We consider the set'$$ S = \lbrace (F,h):F is a decreasing function from R^{+} to R^{+}, h\in R, 0=1- \frac{\theta + 1}{\theta} \frac {\int^{h}_{y=0} ... We consider the set

'$$ S = \lbrace (F,h):F is a decreasing function from R^{+} to R^{+}, h\in R, 0=1- \frac{\theta + 1}{\theta} \frac {\int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy}{F(0)} \frac{F(0)-\frac{1}{2}F(h)}{F(0)-F(h)} \rbrace $$'

The function L is defined on S by

'$$ L(F,h) = \frac{ \int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=x} F(y) dy dx} { \int^{h}_{x=0} \int^{h}_{y=0} F(y) dy dx} h $$']]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18812) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18812#Comment_18812 2012-03-26T09:39:04-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Charles Rezk http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/31/ The machine at work is firefox 3.5.3 on linux; on there everything displays fine (which is good since I can't update this machine). The machine at work is firefox 3.5.3 on linux; on there everything displays fine (which is good since I can't update this machine).

]]>
WillieWong comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18806) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18806#Comment_18806 2012-03-26T07:17:42-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 WillieWong http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/288/ @Charles: I don't know if you are the only one, but I am not seeing the problem. FWIW I am running Firefox 8 on linux. Is it possible for you to update to a slightly newer version of firefox at all? @Charles: I don't know if you are the only one, but I am not seeing the problem. FWIW I am running Firefox 8 on linux. Is it possible for you to update to a slightly newer version of firefox at all?

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18794) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18794#Comment_18794 2012-03-25T07:42:47-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Charles Rezk http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/31/ Am I the only person seeing this? Am I the only person seeing this?

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18788) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18788#Comment_18788 2012-03-24T11:17:29-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Charles Rezk http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/31/ The spacing in math rendering looks terrible for me right now. I'm using firefox 3.6.17 on linux. It appears as though negative space is being inserted after every bit of math, so that the math ... The spacing in math rendering looks terrible for me right now. I'm using firefox 3.6.17 on linux. It appears as though negative space is being inserted after every bit of math, so that the math runs over the text which immediately follows (Added: the amount of negative space is roughly proportional to the number of symbols in the math). Just about any question is showing this: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92061/square-of-a-continuous-map is one where it is obvious.

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18543) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18543#Comment_18543 2012-02-21T04:16:18-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 scaaahu http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/712/ I tried print preview of couple of threads on Math SE and TCS SE. See no problem. I have not found any thread worth printing on the paper yet - ink is very expensive - I am a retiree. Will report ... Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18538) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18538#Comment_18538 2012-02-18T09:10:08-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Well, within limits. I'm pretty happy, unfortunately for some, to not aspire to IE "compatibility". On the other hand, this looks very likely to actually be some interaction between IE, ... Well, within limits. I'm pretty happy, unfortunately for some, to not aspire to IE "compatibility". On the other hand, this looks very likely to actually be some interaction between IE, MathJax (and possibly the way we load fonts for MathJax?), and as such the MathJax folks are likely to be interested. Can you print from any one sites that use MathJax?

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18513) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18513#Comment_18513 2012-02-16T23:39:24-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 scaaahu http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/712/ Thanks Anton. My printout is different but similar. However, It is much better after I used IE -&gt; Tools -&gt; Compatibility View. I believe there are probably two issues at hand. One is ... Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18512) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18512#Comment_18512 2012-02-16T21:21:00-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @scaaahu: I don't have a solution, but perhaps you can indicate if I've reproduced your problem. The computers in the Caltech math department run windows with IE 8. When I try to print to pdf, I get ... @scaaahu: I don't have a solution, but perhaps you can indicate if I've reproduced your problem. The computers in the Caltech math department run windows with IE 8. When I try to print to pdf, I get the following error from distiller:

%%[ ProductName: Distiller ]%%
MathJax_Math-Italic not found, using Courier.
MathJax_Main-Regular not found, using Courier.
MathJax_Main-Bold not found, using Courier.
%%[ Error: invalidfont; OffendingCommand: show ]%%

Stack:
()


%%[ Flushing: rest of job (to end-of-file) will be ignored ]%%
%%[ Warning: PostScript error. No PDF file produced. ] %%

Print preview (and printing on an actual printer) both work, with the following horrible result:

awful printing

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18507) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18507#Comment_18507 2012-02-16T16:15:56-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ @scaahu. Unfortunately I can't help identify the error, I don't have access to any windows computers. Does anyone else here have access to IE9? Also, it's perfectly possible to install a second ... @scaahu. Unfortunately I can't help identify the error, I don't have access to any windows computers. Does anyone else here have access to IE9? Also, it's perfectly possible to install a second browser in windows, without changing anyone else's experience. (E.g. install Google Chrome, easy to use and relatively excellent security, and as long as you don't set it as the default browser other users of the computer needn't even notice.)

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18495) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18495#Comment_18495 2012-02-15T19:39:13-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 scaaahu http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/712/ &quot;MathJax hasn't been carefully tested in IE9's print preview mode&quot; is probably the reason.&quot;Have trouble&quot; means the errors are not consistent. The first part the ...
"Have trouble" means the errors are not consistent. The first part the print out of the second answer looked ok. Then I started to see gabbage stuff in the last part of the second answer.

As far as I know, IE9 is the newest IE on Windows. By "better browser" did you mean Firefox?

I am a retiree sharing the computer with my wife. There is no way I can take the computer away from her and install another browser. I might try the printing in the local library. They have Windows XP and IE8.]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18489) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18489#Comment_18489 2012-02-15T15:40:04-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ @scaaahu, perhaps you could post the printed version somewhere, so we can have a look? It's a bit hard to guess what's happening if you just say that you "Have trouble". I'm guessing that ... @scaaahu, perhaps you could post the printed version somewhere, so we can have a look? It's a bit hard to guess what's happening if you just say that you "Have trouble". I'm guessing that MathJax hasn't been carefully tested in IE9's print preview mode. Perhaps you might try a better browser? :-)

]]>
scaaahu comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18476) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18476#Comment_18476 2012-02-14T21:06:30-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 scaaahu http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/712/ I don't know where to report this issue. If this is wrong place, please direct me to the right one. I am using Windows Vista and IE9. I was trying to print ... I don't know where to report this issue. If this is wrong place, please direct me to the right one.

I am using Windows Vista and IE9. I was trying to print http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88368/can-a-group-be-a-universal-turing-machine.

The math symbols like SL_3(Z) disappeared from the Question part.

The math symbols in the first answer look ok. Have trouble with printing the second answer.

Using Print Preview showed the same result. I'd like to know if it's my OS/browser/printer problem, or something I won't be able to fix on my end. Thanks.

]]>
David White comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18451) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18451#Comment_18451 2012-02-13T11:37:11-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 David White http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/574/ Having just reached 2K reputation, I thought I'd edit a post to fix some bad latex. I got it to display in the Preview Math mode but for some reason it breaks again after I save my edit. Here's the ... http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88362/permutation-of-projective-limits-with-inductive-limits

Any ideas on what could cause this?

EDIT: Using backticks fixed the problem. Thanks to those who posted early in this thread about that particular life-saving measure.]]>
MTS comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (18257) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=18257#Comment_18257 2012-02-02T09:06:26-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 MTS http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/689/ MathJax appears not to be rendering at all for me now. It works fine for example on MathSciNet, but not on MO. I am using Firefox 9 on Ubuntu. Any thoughts? Edit: I figured out what the problem ... MathJax appears not to be rendering at all for me now. It works fine for example on MathSciNet, but not on MO. I am using Firefox 9 on Ubuntu. Any thoughts?

Edit: I figured out what the problem was. I was connecting to the internet through a proxy server (the UC Berkeley library proxy, if it matters) and that was making MO not work. It seems that the problem was specific to StackExchange-type sites. I discovered it when I tried to find something on the AskUbuntu StackExchange site - there was a bar at the top saying that the page was trying to load JavaScript from another domain and that the browser was blocking it. Anyway, turning off the proxy worked - now I use the FireFox plugin FoxyProxy which allows you to switch proxies based on url patterns, so I don't have to manually change it all the time.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16820) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16820#Comment_16820 2011-11-02T02:33:19-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ Apologize in advance if I'm posting in the wrong place Yes you are. General MathJaX bugs should be reported on the MathJaX support site. This is for MathJaX rendering on MathOverflow, and only on ...

Apologize in advance if I'm posting in the wrong place

Yes you are. General MathJaX bugs should be reported on the MathJaX support site. This is for MathJaX rendering on MathOverflow, and only on MathOverflow.

]]>
Scott Stornetta comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16799) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16799#Comment_16799 2011-11-01T11:24:38-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Stornetta http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/653/ Apologize in advance if I'm posting in the wrong place, but I have been working with MathJax and have a browser problem to report with the LateX \overline macro. I have a webpage which makes use of ... Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16791) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16791#Comment_16791 2011-10-31T14:54:11-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ Oh, I see. I deleted the / a couple of hours after my original post. You went to the original source instead of there. Oh, I see. I deleted the / a couple of hours after my original post. You went to the original source instead of there.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16790) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16790#Comment_16790 2011-10-31T14:35:18-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ If you look at the source of your original post, it reads: For the basic result, start with &lt;a ... If you look at the source of your original post, it reads:

For the basic result, start with

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson–Lindenstrauss_lemma/">Wikipedia</a>

or Google "Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma".

In the URL, there is a /. Since I cut-and-pasted from that to do all my experiments, a lot of them had a trailing slash. Sometimes that doesn't matter, sometimes it does. I will freely admit that I should have spotted that and removed it before doing further analysis. Ultimately, the en-dash was the real reason why it didn't work, the trailing slash was what meant that I didn't spot that putting in an ordinary hyphen did work.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16789) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16789#Comment_16789 2011-10-31T14:26:35-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ Thanks, Andrew. I do not understand your comment about / at the end as I did not put one in... Thanks, Andrew. I do not understand your comment about / at the end as I did not put one in...

]]>
Emil J comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16785) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16785#Comment_16785 2011-10-31T13:02:39-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Emil J http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/514/ Yes, IME, the browser (Firefox) escapes all cut-and-paste URLs automatically so that it all works out, but I suspect that some other browsers may get it wrong. As for replacing en-dashes with ... Yes, IME, the browser (Firefox) escapes all cut-and-paste URLs automatically so that it all works out, but I suspect that some other browsers may get it wrong. As for replacing en-dashes with hyphens, this only works on Wikipedia because they have a general policy asking article authors (or renamers) to provide redirects in such cases, it is not guaranteed to work in general on other sites.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16784) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16784#Comment_16784 2011-10-31T12:22:32-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ I would have thought that Wikipedia would automatically make redirects to "sanitised" versions of pages, but I can't find one for that page itself Turns out that it does. There was ...

I would have thought that Wikipedia would automatically make redirects to "sanitised" versions of pages, but I can't find one for that page itself

Turns out that it does. There was another problem with the URL that you put in: the / at the end. The correct URL doesn't have that. Somehow in my experimenting with replacing the dash then I overlooked the slash and got false negatives.

Incidentally, when I cut-and-paste the URL using my browser from the page in question, then it gets correctly escaped. That is, when cut-and-pasting here I get:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Lindenstrauss_lemma

Replacing the en-dash by an ordinary hyphen also works:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson-Lindenstrauss_lemma leads to this link. If you click on that, then you'll notice that it goes to the correct page but just below the title is a little "Redirected from ..." message which tells you that the URL that you typed wasn't the real page name, but an alias.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16782) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16782#Comment_16782 2011-10-31T12:12:47-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ It isn't the underscore, it's the dash. Whoever created that page on Wikipedia used an ndash to hyphenate the names. Whilst this is technically correct, it makes the link somewhat tricky to type ... It isn't the underscore, it's the dash. Whoever created that page on Wikipedia used an ndash to hyphenate the names. Whilst this is technically correct, it makes the link somewhat tricky to type in! You need to be able to type in unicode URLs. StackExchange's Markdown parser only allows certain things in its HTML (see my comment above about sanitising). It would seem that unicode is not allowed. So what Survit did was to replace the unicode character by its "escaped" version - that's the percent stuff.

There's ways to find these escapings, but I don't know of one off-hand. (I would have thought that Wikipedia would automatically make redirects to "sanitised" versions of pages, but I can't find one for that page itself).

Usually, Markdown's own syntax for links is better than using raw HTML, but in this case even that doesn't work. The escaping method is the only one that I can make work correctly. (On the other hand, the Markdown syntax does work correctly here: [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson–Lindenstrauss_lemma) correctly produces Wikipedia).

I just tried on the SE2.0 system and witnessed the same behaviour, so this wouldn't be fixed by migrating!

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16779) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16779#Comment_16779 2011-10-31T08:53:56-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ It's on http://mathoverflow.net/questions/79388/minimum-space-dimension-to-place-n-points-knowing-pairwise-distances/79395#79395 Andrew. It's on

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/79388/minimum-space-dimension-to-place-n-points-knowing-pairwise-distances/79395#79395

Andrew.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16777) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16777#Comment_16777 2011-10-31T00:42:58-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ (This isn't a MathJaX isssue, by the way.) The link (and Scott's &lt;pre> attempt) doesn't work here because the Markdown filter here strips out HTML tags before processing. So any HTML tags ... (This isn't a MathJaX isssue, by the way.)

The link (and Scott's <pre> attempt) doesn't work here because the Markdown filter here strips out HTML tags before processing. So any HTML tags get escaped. (Although this stripping is not 100% safe).

On MO, some HTML is allowed, including <a> tags (what is and isn't allowed is governed by a "whitelist" that is listed somewhere on meta.SO). When I cut and paste the code you gave into a blank "Ask a Question" then the preview converts it to a link. So either there's a difference between the preview and what is actually rendered (unlikely in so simple an example) or there's more to your example than just the link. Could you link to the actual post?

More generally, Markdown and HTML are not really meant to mix.

That is about as wrong as it can be! Markdown and HTML are meant to mix. Markdown goes out of its way to be polite to HTML: if it spots any HTML then it says, "I assume that the user knows what they are doing and will just let this go through.". The problem is that many people who've implemented their own version of Markdown have decided that the average user does not know what they are doing and so put in a pre-filter to strip out anything Bad. These pre-filters are complicated because they have to understand both HTML and Markdown. What they should have done is put in a post-filter to check that the final rendering is clean as the post-filter only has to understand HTML.

(Naturally, the nLab and the nForum get it right.)

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16760) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16760#Comment_16760 2011-10-29T13:16:06-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ I tried backtics--they did not work no matter where I placed them. I tried backtics--they did not work no matter where I placed them.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16759) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16759#Comment_16759 2011-10-29T13:01:17-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Hehe, witness above my failed attempt to use a &lt;pre> tag to prevent Markdown parsing the square brackets. Bumps indeed! Hehe, witness above my failed attempt to use a <pre> tag to prevent Markdown parsing the square brackets. Bumps indeed!

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16758) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16758#Comment_16758 2011-10-29T13:00:18-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Almost certainly it's the underscore. Try backticks surrounding the a tag. More generally, Markdown and HTML are not really meant to mix. (That is, the &lt;pre>text&lt;/pre> syntax is ... Almost certainly it's the underscore. Try backticks surrounding the a tag.

More generally, Markdown and HTML are not really meant to mix. (That is, the <pre>text</pre> syntax is preferred to using <a> tags), but of course it's convenient to do so. This sometimes results in some bumps.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16747) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16747#Comment_16747 2011-10-28T13:51:17-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ I used &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Lindenstrauss_lemma">Wikipedia&lt;/a> in a post, but it did not render properly. I see that it also does not ... I used

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Lindenstrauss_lemma">Wikipedia</a>

in a post, but it did not render properly. I see that it also does not render here on Meta at all. Why? Survit edited it to

Wikipedia

which worked fine, but I thought ordinary HTML links worked.

]]>
DavidRoberts comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (16155) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=16155#Comment_16155 2011-09-18T18:02:56-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 DavidRoberts http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/588/ I'm running ff3.6 (not my choice - my work won't upgrade), and I'm getting math processing errors all round. I'm running ff3.6 (not my choice - my work won't upgrade), and I'm getting math processing errors all round.

]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15989) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15989#Comment_15989 2011-09-06T11:41:12-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ Thanks, Andrew. Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15988) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15988#Comment_15988 2011-09-06T11:25:08-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ Bill, That's a text command, not a maths command. MathJaX only supports mathematics commands (well, a subset thereof). If you really want to use proper LaTeX to write MO posts, contact me by ... Bill,

That's a text command, not a maths command. MathJaX only supports mathematics commands (well, a subset thereof). If you really want to use proper LaTeX to write MO posts, contact me by email.

In the meantime, lists are done by Markdown syntax:

1. First item
1. Second item
1. Third item

Produces

  1. First item
  2. Second item
  3. Third item
]]>
Bill Johnson comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15986) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15986#Comment_15986 2011-09-06T10:48:16-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Bill Johnson http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/133/ The LaTeX \begin{enumerate} command seems not to work either with or without back tics. Is there a good substitute? Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15758) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15758#Comment_15758 2011-08-24T10:38:46-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ The popup voloch and Charles is confusing, since nothing has changed in our MathJax configuration for a long time. The popup voloch and Charles is confusing, since nothing has changed in our MathJax configuration for a long time.

]]>
Charles Rezk comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15756) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15756#Comment_15756 2011-08-24T10:07:14-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Charles Rezk http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/31/ I'm getting the same kind of popup voloch mentioned several weeks ago. Whenever I load a mathoverflow page, I get the following popup message: MathJax no longer loads a default configuration file; ... I'm getting the same kind of popup voloch mentioned several weeks ago. Whenever I load a mathoverflow page, I get the following popup message:

MathJax no longer loads a default configuration file; you must specify such files explicitly. This page seems to use the older default config/MathJax.js file, and so needs to be updated. This is explained further at

http://www.mathjax.org/help/configuration

Added: Clearing my browser cache seems to fix it.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15687) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15687#Comment_15687 2011-08-22T09:36:43-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ MathJax doesn't ever read the text in the textarea, but it does read the preview box over and over in order to update the preview. Once it learns the macro, I think it remembers it until you move to ... MathJax doesn't ever read the text in the textarea, but it does read the preview box over and over in order to update the preview. Once it learns the macro, I think it remembers it until you move to a different page.

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15682) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15682#Comment_15682 2011-08-22T02:53:33-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ Probably MathJaX read the definition in the textarea which comes before the preview box and so the newcommand was in effect when the preview box was parsed. This relationship was, obviously, changed ... Probably MathJaX read the definition in the textarea which comes before the preview box and so the newcommand was in effect when the preview box was parsed. This relationship was, obviously, changed when you saved your answer.

]]>
David Speyer comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15640) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15640#Comment_15640 2011-08-18T08:51:05-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 David Speyer http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/23/ In this answer http://mathoverflow.net/questions/73120/torsion-free-tensor-powers/73161#73161 , I define a macro \mm for \mathfrak{m}. It shows correctly in the preview, but when I load the actual ...
Details:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110803 Firefox/3.6.20

UPDATE: Nevermind, I just realized that I defined the macro after I used it (fixed now). So the peculiar behavior is that preview let me get away with it, not that the main page didn't.]]>
voloch comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (15337) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=15337#Comment_15337 2011-07-31T12:01:21-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 voloch http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/211/ When viewing an MO page, I got a pop-up telling me to go to this page: http://www.mathjax.org/help/configuration/I assume this needs to be done server-side.
I assume this needs to be done server-side.]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14854) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14854#Comment_14854 2011-07-03T10:02:26-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Just use \( ... \) for the nested math, instead of $ ... $. L Spice comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14853) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14853#Comment_14853 2011-07-03T07:34:12-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 L Spice http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/579/ The processor gets confused on the admittedly complicated case where a \text block contains math. For example, I couldn't typeset the legitimate TeX code \Ext^1_{\text{$\mathbb F_p$-alg}}. (It is ... The processor gets confused on the admittedly complicated case where a \text block contains math. For example, I couldn't typeset the legitimate TeX code \Ext^1_{\text{$\mathbb F_p$-alg}}. (It is surely possible, but I think unsatisfactory, to type instead \Ext^1_{\mathbb F_p\text{-alg}}.)

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14571) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14571#Comment_14571 2011-05-19T19:27:52-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere? http://mathoverflow.net/faq#latex , where it says "workaround".

Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere?

http://mathoverflow.net/faq#latex , where it says "workaround".

]]>
Qiaochu Yuan comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14558) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14558#Comment_14558 2011-05-19T10:02:14-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Qiaochu Yuan http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/13/ If it was the subscripts, that's a known issue that's been discussed on meta before. Subscripts and asterisks are both parsed as MarkDown and occasionally need to be escaped by a backslash to be used ... If it was the subscripts, that's a known issue that's been discussed on meta before. Subscripts and asterisks are both parsed as MarkDown and occasionally need to be escaped by a backslash to be used properly.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14554) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14554#Comment_14554 2011-05-19T05:25:10-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 geraldedgar http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/116/ Thanks for fixing the display. Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere? Thanks for fixing the display. Is this remedy in an FAQ somewhere?

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14537) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14537#Comment_14537 2011-05-18T07:03:57-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 dthurston http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/196/ geraldedgar: I think the double dollar signs confused the parser, or maybe the subscripts. I added backquotes around the displayed math and it fixed the issue. geraldedgar: I think the double dollar signs confused the parser, or maybe the subscripts. I added backquotes around the displayed math and it fixed the issue.

]]>
geraldedgar comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14536) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14536#Comment_14536 2011-05-18T05:30:46-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 geraldedgar http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/116/ Is it something I did? In my answer at http://mathoverflow.net/questions/65288 the display does not TeX. I copied it from the Question, then made a few changes. dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14531) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14531#Comment_14531 2011-05-17T14:05:46-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 dthurston http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/196/ I doubt it's a rendering issue, since it also shows up for me in Chromium. This is obviously and typically a conversion issue; this is what you get if you just enter italic text in math mode without ... I doubt it's a rendering issue, since it also shows up for me in Chromium. This is obviously and typically a conversion issue; this is what you get if you just enter italic text in math mode without protection. See also theojf's answer in the separate thread I started on this, before realising it should be here.

If you want me to report the bug, I need to know details like which version of MathJax you're using and how it's configured.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14500) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14500#Comment_14500 2011-05-14T20:31:54-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @dthurston: yes, I agree that the second one is ugly, though I wouldn't have called it exceptionally or horrendously ugly. Perhaps somebody here knows if this is an issue with how MathJax converts to ... @dthurston: yes, I agree that the second one is ugly, though I wouldn't have called it exceptionally or horrendously ugly. Perhaps somebody here knows if this is an issue with how MathJax converts to MathML or with how Firefox renders MathML. It's probably a good idea to ask on a MathJax forum.

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14497) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14497#Comment_14497 2011-05-14T19:41:40-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 dthurston http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/196/ @Anton: your second snapshot is about what I see, and is horrendously ugly. I'm very surprised you don't see that. Look at the spacing between the 'f's. It's doing the thing TeX does by default, ... @Anton: your second snapshot is about what I see, and is horrendously ugly. I'm very surprised you don't see that. Look at the spacing between the 'f's. It's doing the thing TeX does by default, which is to typeset anything in math mode as though it were a product ("D times i times f times f"), which is not all what is intended.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14493) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14493#Comment_14493 2011-05-14T10:58:05-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @dthurston: could you include a screenshot? It doesn't look particularly ugly to me. I've tried both HTML+CSS and MathML rendering on Firefox 3.6.16 on Ubuntu (Edit: they look like and , ... @dthurston: could you include a screenshot? It doesn't look particularly ugly to me. I've tried both HTML+CSS and MathML rendering on Firefox 3.6.16 on Ubuntu (Edit: they look like html+css and mathml, respectively, but not as pixilated)

]]>
dthurston comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (14490) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=14490#Comment_14490 2011-05-14T06:19:11-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 dthurston http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/196/ I asked this as a separate discussion, but probably it belongs here. The command \mathit seems to be completely ignored in LaTeX input. This yields exceptionally ugly results at times, eg, here. ... I asked this as a separate discussion, but probably it belongs here.

The command \mathit seems to be completely ignored in LaTeX input. This yields exceptionally ugly results at times, eg, here. Why does this happen, and can it be fixed?

(\textit likewise does not work right.)

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13855) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13855#Comment_13855 2011-03-29T20:14:34-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @shogun70: Thanks for all your help! I've moved the .htaccess file to the parent directory. Now otf and eot files appear to have the correct headers. @shogun70: Thanks for all your help! I've moved the .htaccess file to the parent directory. Now otf and eot files appear to have the correct headers.

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13838) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13838#Comment_13838 2011-03-29T02:42:24-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 shogun70 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/523/ @Scott: Yes, the files are being gzip'ed now. @Anton: You've found a MathJax documentation error - that location will work (is working) for .otf files (needed for Firefox) but not .eot (needed for ...
@Anton: You've found a MathJax documentation error - that location will work (is working) for .otf files (needed for Firefox) but not .eot (needed for IE9). I can't check mathoverflow.net with IE9 until tomorrow, but I assume it is rendering math with image fonts.

The mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/.htaccess file should be moved to an ancestor directory of the one it is currently in, or merged with the .htaccess file in the top directory (mathjax1.1/.htaccess).]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13811) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13811#Comment_13811 2011-03-27T08:21:20-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ The htaccess file handling the fonts is in mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/, like the MathJax docs recommend. The htaccess file handling the fonts is in mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/, like the MathJax docs recommend.

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13810) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13810#Comment_13810 2011-03-27T08:05:19-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ Okay, I think I added the DEFLATE filter. Could someone (@shogun70?) check that it's working? Actually, I'm a bit confused about our .htaccess files for latex.mathoverflow.net. @Anton, the .htaccess ... Okay, I think I added the DEFLATE filter. Could someone (@shogun70?) check that it's working?

Actually, I'm a bit confused about our .htaccess files for latex.mathoverflow.net. @Anton, the .htaccess I added a line to didn't have anything about "Access-Control-Allow-Origin", and I couldn't find any others. Where did you do this?

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13797) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13797#Comment_13797 2011-03-24T16:49:59-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 shogun70 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/523/ @Scott: I assume latex.mathoverflow.net is hosted at dreamhost .com. The dreamhost wiki indicates that the DEFLATE output filter is available, see http://wiki.dreamhost.com/DEFLATE and can be ... Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13796) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13796#Comment_13796 2011-03-24T15:05:55-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ It's comments like that which make me wish that meta.MO had a soundtrack. There ought to have been some menacing music building to a crescendo at the words "root access" (with possibly ... It's comments like that which make me wish that meta.MO had a soundtrack. There ought to have been some menacing music building to a crescendo at the words "root access" (with possibly some manic laughter off-stage).

]]>
Scott Morrison comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13795) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13795#Comment_13795 2011-03-24T14:07:37-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Scott Morrison http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/3/ I'm pretty sure I don't need to do anything further, but for future reference we can control exactly what is controllable via .htaccess files, and nothing more. On the other hand, if it ever comes ... I'm pretty sure I don't need to do anything further, but for future reference we can control exactly what is controllable via .htaccess files, and nothing more.

On the other hand, if it ever comes to it we have some alternative hosts (sitting under various people's office desks, in Toronto or Berkeley) where I have root access and full control of apache.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13774) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13774#Comment_13774 2011-03-23T13:46:34-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @shogun70: Holy moly, you're right! It looks like I screwed up the upgrade to MathJax 1.1 and called the file .htacess instead of .htaccess. It should be corrected now. Thanks for catching this! @shogun70: Holy moly, you're right! It looks like I screwed up the upgrade to MathJax 1.1 and called the file .htacess instead of .htaccess. It should be corrected now. Thanks for catching this!

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13773) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13773#Comment_13773 2011-03-23T13:23:00-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 shogun70 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/523/ @Anton,Using the following curl -D headers.txt http://latex.mathoverflow.net/mathjax/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_Main-Regular.otf &gt; /dev/nullI do see the Access-Control-Allow-Origin ...
Using the following
curl -D headers.txt http://latex.mathoverflow.net/mathjax/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_Main-Regular.otf > /dev/null
I do see the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header.

Using
curl -D headers.txt http://latex.mathoverflow.net/mathjax1.1/fonts/HTML-CSS/TeX/otf/MathJax_Main-Regular.otf > /dev/null
I do NOT see the header.]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13771) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13771#Comment_13771 2011-03-23T10:33:56-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @shogun70: We already have such an .htaccess file. See this thread. @Scott M: (not in response to anything he's posted here recently) How much control do you have over Apache? Can you tell it to ... @shogun70: We already have such an .htaccess file. See this thread.

@Scott M: (not in response to anything he's posted here recently) How much control do you have over Apache? Can you tell it to gzip MathJax as shogun70 suggests?

]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13765) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13765#Comment_13765 2011-03-22T22:11:38-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 shogun70 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/523/ @Anton,I also noticed that resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net (basically MathJax) don't seem to be gzip'ed. All files in the MathJax distribution can be reduced with gzip, with the ...
I also noticed that resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net (basically MathJax) don't seem to be gzip'ed.
All files in the MathJax distribution can be reduced with gzip, with the exception of png files (for image fonts).

In Apache, something like the following might be appropriate:
AddOutputFilter DEFLATE html xhtml css xml svg js eot otf ttf]]>
shogun70 comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13764) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13764#Comment_13764 2011-03-22T22:11:16-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 shogun70 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/523/ @Evan, @Anton,For cross-site use (e.g. resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net) Firefox requires font-files to be delivered with the HTTP header Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *On mathoverflow ...
For cross-site use (e.g. resources residing on latex.mathoverflow.net) Firefox requires font-files to be delivered with the HTTP header
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

On mathoverflow this header isn't set so the font-files aren't applied and MathJax falls back to font images.
This HTTP header is also required for cross-site font-files in IE9.

For Apache, something like the following in an appropriate .htaccess file would work:
<FilesMatch "\.(otf|eot)$">
<IfModule mod_headers.c>
Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
</IfModule>
</FilesMatch>

EDIT:
Actually, I forgot that this is already in the documentation. See the Notes about Shared Installations at http://www.mathjax.org/docs/1.1/installation.html]]>
Ilya Grigoriev comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13755) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13755#Comment_13755 2011-03-22T11:47:45-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Ilya Grigoriev http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/79/ MathJax has trouble being printed with Opera (it looks fine on-screen). Often, there are blank spaces instead of formulas or alignment errors. For example, I couldn't print the answer to the ...
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/32387/computation-of-homology-groups-of-m-g-n]]>
Kelly Davis comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13735) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13735#Comment_13735 2011-03-21T11:18:33-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Kelly Davis http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/300/ In the above question after adding some back-ticks the problem seems to go away on OS X chrome, but stil live on in iPad safari. Meh. Kelly Davis comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13733) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13733#Comment_13733 2011-03-21T02:16:39-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Kelly Davis http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/300/ On my question:http://mathoverflow.net/questions/59046/can-you-flip-the-end-of-a-large-exotic-mathbbr4inclusion of \langle and \rangle latex tags makes rendering on a mac, with the latest chrome, and ...
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/59046/can-you-flip-the-end-of-a-large-exotic-mathbbr4

inclusion of \langle and \rangle latex tags makes rendering on a mac, with the latest chrome, and on an iPad, with the latest safari, place the < and > incorrectly and also sometimes places surrounding text incorrectly also.]]>
Evan Jenkins comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13661) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13661#Comment_13661 2011-03-16T16:49:55-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Evan Jenkins http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/319/ @Anton: I tried clearing my cache, but it's still doing it in both versions of Firefox. @Anton: I tried clearing my cache, but it's still doing it in both versions of Firefox.

]]>
Anton Geraschenko comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13658) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13658#Comment_13658 2011-03-16T15:29:34-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Anton Geraschenko http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/ @Evan: as you can see from the comment thread to that issue, we actually updated to those fonts right away. Today (about twenty minutes ago) we upgraded to MathJax 1.1, which has some improvements in ... @Evan: as you can see from the comment thread to that issue, we actually updated to those fonts right away. Today (about twenty minutes ago) we upgraded to MathJax 1.1, which has some improvements in browser support. Try clearing your cache. If the problem persists, please leave a post saying so.

]]>
Evan Jenkins comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13642) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13642#Comment_13642 2011-03-15T13:55:31-07:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Evan Jenkins http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/319/ For some reason, MathJax renders everything as PNG images for me in Firefox (both Firefox 3.6.13 and the Firefox 4 RC) on OS X (10.6.6), while both Chrome and Safari correctly render everything using ... For some reason, MathJax renders everything as PNG images for me in Firefox (both Firefox 3.6.13 and the Firefox 4 RC) on OS X (10.6.6), while both Chrome and Safari correctly render everything using web fonts. This problem is specific to MO; the demos on the MathJax web site, for instance, work fine in either version of Firefox. Could this be related to this issue?

]]>
Andrew Stacey comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13623) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13623#Comment_13623 2011-03-10T01:51:06-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 Andrew Stacey http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/4/ I thought that MathJaX wasn't enabled for the main page. I seem to be getting quite a few "busy script" error messages these days on the main page. (Though it might be that the script is ... I thought that MathJaX wasn't enabled for the main page. I seem to be getting quite a few "busy script" error messages these days on the main page.

(Though it might be that the script is still trying to work on the page I was on before navigating to the main page; nonetheless, I feel as though I'm getting more of these than I used to.)

]]>
grp comments on "Report bugs with LaTeX (MathJax) rendering here." (13563) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/637/report-bugs-with-latex-mathjax-rendering-here/?Focus=13563#Comment_13563 2011-03-02T23:11:13-08:00 2018-11-04T12:54:31-08:00 grp http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/187/ I appreciate (and will accept) your debugging help, but will take this to email.Gerhard Paseman, 2011.03.02
Gerhard Paseman, 2011.03.02]]>