tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed (Bounties) Sun, 04 Nov 2018 23:22:16 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher minasteris comments on "Bounties" (12941) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12941#Comment_12941 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12941#Comment_12941 Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:17:02 -0800 minasteris Scott Morrison comments on "Bounties" (12928) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12928#Comment_12928 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12928#Comment_12928 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:04:37 -0800 Scott Morrison Also, remember that at this point essentially everyone agrees that the whole bounty system is hopelessly broken. The SE 2.0 sites have already moved to a different model, but we're stuck in limbo.

]]>
Ben Webster comments on "Bounties" (12923) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12923#Comment_12923 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12923#Comment_12923 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:02:51 -0800 Ben Webster Andres- The logic is that you should not have an incentive not to award the bounty. Otherwise it would very tempting to just not accept any answer that isn't absolutely perfect.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Bounties" (12922) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12922#Comment_12922 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12922#Comment_12922 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:29:41 -0800 Andres Caicedo Gerry Myerson comments on "Bounties" (12918) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12918#Comment_12918 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12918#Comment_12918 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:16:44 -0800 Gerry Myerson Bill Johnson comments on "Bounties" (12912) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12912#Comment_12912 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12912#Comment_12912 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:36:11 -0800 Bill Johnson Andres Caicedo comments on "Bounties" (12911) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12911#Comment_12911 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12911#Comment_12911 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:10:33 -0800 Andres Caicedo minasteris comments on "Bounties" (12910) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12910#Comment_12910 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12910#Comment_12910 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:35:57 -0800 minasteris Andres Caicedo comments on "Bounties" (12909) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12909#Comment_12909 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12909#Comment_12909 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:33:29 -0800 Andres Caicedo Valerio Talamanca comments on "Bounties" (12907) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12907#Comment_12907 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12907#Comment_12907 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:54:23 -0800 Valerio Talamanca François G. Dorais comments on "Bounties" (12906) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12906#Comment_12906 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12906#Comment_12906 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:33:16 -0800 François G. Dorais Since the software gives an extra 50 points on each bounty, you can set a bounty for 50 points more than your net worth.

]]>
Andres Caicedo comments on "Bounties" (12900) http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12900#Comment_12900 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/927/bounties/?Focus=12900#Comment_12900 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:18:50 -0800 Andres Caicedo
[My understanding was that the amount would be subtracted from the reputation of the person asking, but I may have misunderstood.]

2. If the answer to 1. is no, but one goes ahead and tries to set up such a bounty anyway, does the software prevents this from happening?

3. And, finally, if the software doesn't stop this, then what happens when an answer is accepted? ]]>