tea.mathoverflow.net - Discussion Feed ("hot" vs. "active")2018-11-04T13:46:40-08:00http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Anton Geraschenko comments on ""hot" vs. "active"" (7057)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/510/hot-vs-active/?Focus=7057#Comment_70572010-07-15T14:03:56-07:002018-11-04T13:46:40-08:00Anton Geraschenkohttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/2/
You can find the formula on meta.SO. I always look at the active tab instead of the hot tab, so I don't have a strong opinion about how the hot algorithm should work.
You can find the formula on meta.SO. I always look at the active tab instead of the hot tab, so I don't have a strong opinion about how the hot algorithm should work.
]]>
Ryan Budney comments on ""hot" vs. "active"" (7035)http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/510/hot-vs-active/?Focus=7035#Comment_70352010-07-15T02:42:32-07:002018-11-04T13:46:40-08:00Ryan Budneyhttp://mathoverflow.tqft.net/account/107/
On the main mathoverflow page, there are tabs "hot" and "active". If you let your mouse hang over those buttons, little descriptions come up. Hot - ...
If you let your mouse hang over those buttons, little descriptions come up.
Hot - "questions with the most activity and interest within the last few days"
Active - "questions that have been asked, answered or updated recently".
I find the blurbs don't match up with reality.
Q: What is the algorithm to decide the rankings on the "hot" and "active" pages?
I find the "active" page to be reasonably useful. But the "hot" page gives me a listing of questions that have few votes, and no answers. If anything the "hot" page should be called the "inactive" page.]]>