Some answers and questions automatically get flagged as potentially low-quality for a variety of reasons, such as an answer that consists mostly of links. The courses of actions for the review process are Looks Good, Edit, Delete and Not Sure. The last defers to the issue to other volunteers, the other three options have obvious meanings. If you volunteer, you get presented a series of flagged posts and you must select one of the four options to see the next post in the queue.
]]>Like a particular number that will forever be associated with the digital copy of the paper. Sort of like a DNA.
]]>[Edit: Added link after Charles's comment below.]
]]>Is there a MO policy toward links-as-answers? Do we want to accept what appears to be the official SE policy, or make ours different?
]]>