Sun, 04 Nov 2018 13:48:32 -0800 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9 & Feed Publisher http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18057#Comment_18057 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18057#Comment_18057 Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:43:10 -0800 quid Regarding Ricky Demers's suggestion in 2nd. This exists. Below hundred there seems to be a 20min delay for questions and a 2min delay for answers; cf FAQs user privileges at 100.

]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18040#Comment_18040 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18040#Comment_18040 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:43:39 -0800 Ricky Demer
Second, I would find that too strict, and if we could do something like that, I'd only want to stop users such
that none of their question had been "approved" from posting more than one question in a specific time-frame. ]]> http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18036#Comment_18036 http://mathoverflow.tqft.net/discussion/1277/moderating-questions-for-posters-with-low-reputation/?Focus=18036#Comment_18036 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:48:20 -0800 anthonyquas
I'm wondering if it would make sense for questions from posters with low reputation (say under 100) to be quarantined and put in an "approval queue" which could be accessed by users with higher reputation (for example the same reputation as that needed to vote to close questions). This might help limit some of the "what is $\int_{-5}^5 (1+x^2)\,dx$ questions that we seem to see a lot of. ]]>