Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Is this question acceptable?: [Closed] deliberately closing questions

Bottom of Page

1 to 9 of 9

  1.  
    • CommentAuthortrustgod
    • CommentTimeAug 13th 2011
     
    i want the moderator to see that i have never asked any stupid question ,nor i claimed that i have solved something,but unnecessarily some people having previous grudges closing my questions without any reason ,atleast flag them who close the questions without any reasons,i request whats problem with the today's question http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72858/composition-of-the-galois-group
    • CommentAuthorAlex Bartel
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2011 edited
     

    Please read the FAQ. Here is an excerpt (but you would do well to read the rest, too):

    MathOverflow's primary goal is for users to ask and answer research level math questions

    Your question is not a research level question. The answer is: read up on the definition of the absolute Galois group, which can be found in most introductory texts on algebraic number theory. This is assuming that I understand the question correctly, which usually involves a lot of guess work with most of your questions.

    Here are some general requests and suggestions:

    1. Please ask your questions on math.stackexchange.com. Do not reask them here, even if you don't get an answer after a day, since that usually means that your question is unclear or that there is no discernible question, not that it's too difficult for that site. If your question is not answered there, think about how to make it a better question and edit it. Read other peoples' questions and try to spot common patterns.

    2. Just ask your question. Leave out anything that is not part of the question. In particular, sentences like "i indeed find it to be a very useful theory,and i got new notions in it [Galois theory]", or "i think it has to do a lot with the enigmas of the underlying things" are superfluous. You might want to google "si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses". I think I am speaking not just for myself, but I will be careful and say: personally, I don't want to hear your philosophising about mathematics, about mathematicians, about enigmas, about god, or, for that matter, any philosophising at all.

    3. Ask your question ones. Here are some excerpts from the post you cite: "what does the absolute Galois Group Gal(\bar{Q}/Q) encodes within itself...what does Gal(\bar{k}/k) contain??...can any body tell what does that group contains precisely". Again, you are fairly safe to assume that this applies to more people than just me, but I personally don't need to hear the same thing three times in two lines to understand what the question is. Conversely, if the question is badly formulated or if there is no question, then repeating it three times won't make it better.

    4. Please ask your questions on math.stackexchange.com. If I have already mentioned it before, then I am sure it only reflects how much I would like you to follow that request.

    Edit: let me say one more thing, re "previous grudges". Your questions haven't improved a bit since you first came here. This one got closed for the same reasons that most of your other questions got downvoted and closed. If this had been your first question, it would have been closed just as quickly, since in fact it barely differs from your first questions. Actually, based on your reactions and some of the things you say, my guess is that you don't see a difference between your posts and 99% of the other questions on this site. If my assessment is correct and you don't think that your questions are any different from all the others, then that's another good reason to stop posting until you figure out what the difference is. If you do see a difference, then a) what makes you think that you are entitled to use the site in a way that differs from everybody else's? and b) I would be quite interested to hear what you think the difference is.

    • CommentAuthorRyan Budney
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2011 edited
     

    I believe your concerns were addressed in the comments to your question. It appears (to me) as if you have not been taking the advice given in the replies to your previous questions, and people have grown tired of making exceptions for you.

    Just so you know, this question and one of your previous questions is currently being flagged as spam. With enough votes, I believe this means the question is deleted, not just closed.

    Here are the comments in case the question is deleted:

    what is the problem with this question??,who voted it down,please suggest the comments for closing ,i think this question is alright , – trust god 5 hours ago  

You might get a better reception on math.stackexchange. There are some pretty good mathematicians there, too. – Gerry Myerson 4 hours ago   


but is this a bad question sir,did i claim anything about me,or is it a very elementary question,what is the reason sir??@gerry myerson – trust god 4 hours ago 

One problem with your question is that it is a bit too general. Since you do not tell us what you know, it is more or less impossible to answer in concrete form. Someone can surely come and write a marvelous explanation about What The Absolute Galois Group Hides. But good answers do not make good questions (and people are voting down your question) Moreover, it is usually best if you follow the minimal standard practices with regards to capitalization, punctuation, grammar and even spacing. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 4 hours ago    

The question is not clear. It might mean "what is the absolute Galois group?" in which case it is too elementary. Or it might mean "tell me everything involved in the structure of the absolute Galois group," in which case it's asking for a book (and maybe solutions to some open problems). The word "encode" in the question suggests the latter; the word "contain" suggests the former. Either way, I think the question should be closed. If you have a more reasonable, intermediate question in mind, please make it explicit. – Andreas Blass 4 hours ago  

What is the Galois group of the polynomial x6−16x3+64 over the file Q? – Yemon Choi 3 hours ago 


("file" should be "field" in the previous comment) – Yemon Choi 3 hours ago
  4.  

    We've asked "trust god" to cease using MathOverflow. If there are further posts, please flag for moderator attention.

    • CommentAuthortrustgod
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
     
    @scott Morrison:ok sir,i leave asking questions in any of the mathforums ok,
    but one day will come when people realize that imagination has power to do anything,
    and one day will come when you all repent for your actions ,that you taken to prevent me from mathematics,
    but i will not stop and leave mathematics,i take this to be a challenge to prove my self what i am,

    but i find that people after reading some books and some theories,get filled up with ego,and start claiming that there is no god,but i understood that these mathematics and physics are just the tools that one use to convert the enigmatic and random things in universe into a beautiful ordered things,that fit their logic,its just the process of revealing the enigma behind the things,
    and human being is not inventing any new things that are not present in the universe ,but just transforming the existing things into his language of equations

    and if human takes these many years just to understand the creation and nature,how much time still it takes to find new things,

    and what i observe is that people follow traditional methods,and think science to be ultimate,but there are many mysteries and innumerable open issues that always show the existence of the ultimate ,and many things that science even cant dare to explain,

    cordialmente,
    iyengar
    • CommentAuthortrustgod
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
     
    Alex barter:sir even though your quotation was nice that to keep silence takes the look of philosopher,
    sometimes silence is also bad,
    if the mathematicians and philosophers are silent,then will everyone know what is the world,
    but i dont want to argue

    to everyones satisfaction i accept that everyone are highly talented and are gaints in mathematics,i am a fool and i claim foolish things,i am not fit for asking questions ,
    satisfied???

    but i dont understand that why are people still in local sense,where there is a infinite enigma in front of us unrevealed,
    • CommentAuthorYemon Choi
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2011
     

    I doubt that further discussion on this thread will get us anywhere, apart from confirming conclusions some of us have come to a while ago. I therefore suggest that the thread be closed/locked.

    And very few of us are giants in mathematics, I would wager. This kind of statement is ignorance masking as courtesy.

  8.  

    I therefore suggest that the thread be closed/locked.

    Seconded. I already regret having given that advice in the hope that any of it would stick. I should have known better.

    • CommentAuthorMariano
    • CommentTimeAug 18th 2011
     

    Please do.

1 to 9 of 9

  1.  
Back to Discussions Top of Page