Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Perhaps it will be impossible to come to a consensus about this, but I'd like to know what people's preferences are as to using infinity vs. $\infty$ vs. oo vs. ∞ when talking about (infinity,n)-categories and the like. It's relevant because I'd ideally like to be able to find questions/answers that mention (infinity,n)-categories without having to do a couple separate searches. People might also have other considerations regarding this choice that I haven't thought of.
You might say that having a [higher-category-theory] tag makes this largely-irrelevant issue even more irrelevant but sometimes (infinity,n)-categories come up even when the question isn't directly about them, e.g. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2185/how-to-think-about-model-categories or http://mathoverflow.net/questions/5236/abstract-relation-between-presehaves-and-simplicial-sets
I also wonder if there is a consensus about this on the nLab? I am not an active nLab member, but maybe someone else here is and knows?
Sorry if I'm being pedantic.
With the disclaimer that this is just my opinion, I think the title should be in plain (spoken) English and the text should say $(\infty, n)$ or (∞, n) as it's a standard notation. oo should be discouraged.
Note that ∞-categories seems to be a standard notation for what others call (∞, 1)-categories, so the search by notation won't be trivial. In my opinion, you're better off aggregating several tags, especially [ct.category-theory] and finding out the questions you need manually from that list.
I agree with Ilya that it should be $(\infty, n)$, (infinity, n), or (∞, n), but not (oo,n).
Is this a bug, btw, the titles don't allow many Unicode characters (or rather render them badly)? I notced Greg's first question was messed up by this.
Titles escape the ampersand — which isn't the best idea, imho.
@Harry, I would do ∞-categories in the title in this particular case.
Harry: Naw, you're not the "offending party"; I mean I tried out "oo" in a recent post too. And I've noticed that Urs Schreiber and various other n-category-cafe people seem like to use "oo" as well.
What's the advantage of unicode and HTML entities over LaTeX? Is it that the former is somehow a more standardized, universal, more-likely-to-be-around-in-50-years kind of thing?
I did copy/paste, but now you can do that too :)
1 to 13 of 13