Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
1 to 10 of 10
@jdb: I think part of the point here is that there aren't any non-subjective answers to this question, since the question is inherently subjective. It certainly should have been made community wiki, but it wasn't.
I think there are a lot differences between this question and the children's education question you linked. For instance, not to be discounted is that the children's ed question was asked several months ago. The oligarchy of users who can vote to close is not the same group now as it was in April, and it seems that there is less tolerance for such non-technical questions than there was before. Maybe this is good and maybe it's bad, but the inconsistency isn't itself objectionable: it's a natural outcome of the system.
But aside from that, I read the children's question as an earnest plea for specific information. Probably a lot of people feel passionately about this question and feel that there is a lot at stake here. In contrast, this question has virtually nothing at stake. Isn't the only reasonable answer "Yes, you can read math books any way you want, and you should do so in the way that works best for you"? The disadvantages to skipping ahead are obvious -- you might have missed something by skipping over it, and you might end up having to spend a while flipping through the book to find it or end up reading it from the beginning later on. But that's not my professional opinion, because I don't have a professional opinion on this question: it's just common sense.
Is it worth noting that the poster of the original question followed it up with some apparently insincere time-wasting questions? [Update: these seem to have since been deleted.]
Hi Dan,
I'd like to briefly explain why I commented as I did:
1) The question showed little evidence of being carefully thought-out -- the body of the question wasn't actually a question. I spend some time on Art of Problem Solving, and this question resembles the more mediocre questions posted there by high school students. (This sense is strengthened by Yemon's observation.)
2) This is a discussion question. There is no definitive answer, merely personal opinions, and the appropriate way to discuss such a question involves substantial interaction among answerers.
3) This question has very little to do with mathematics or mathematics education.
By the way, I think your answer is completely reasonable, and (unlike with homework questions) I have no problem with it having gotten in before the question was closed. But fundamentally I don't think this question is "of interest to mathematicians."
1 to 10 of 10