Vanilla 1.1.9 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
There are currently three questions using the tag [symplectic]
Invariant theory explanation of ...
When are two symplectic forms isotopic
Could they be re-tagged into other more widely used tags? Should the [symplectic] tag be removed or renamed? It feels to me a bit of an awkward tag: by all means it should contain, as subsets, all "symplectic X" tags, which seems over broad, while it is only now used for the "other symplectic Xs that don't get their own tags". Also I can't help but feel a bit strange to see just the adjective floating around with no noun to act on.
There's a sg.symplectic-geometry tag and a symplectic-topology tag, which are used for slightly different things. It looks like the third question is "symplectic-topology" and the first two might be "sg.symplectic-geometry", but I'll leave it to the experts to decide.
Is there (and if so, what is it?) a difference between symplectic geometry and topology? (I'm honestly ignorant here.)
@Perutz: thanks for the link. That is very educational. Would you also care to comment about the issue I raised up top? The [symplectic] tag, I'd imagine, has lower specificity, it'd be great if someone more knowledgeable (you, for example) can assign to them the more correct tags.
1 to 9 of 9